[Intel-gfx] [RFC] libdrm_intel: Add support for userptr objects
Damien Lespiau
damien.lespiau at intel.com
Wed Jul 9 15:16:59 CEST 2014
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:08:08PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 06/19/2014 12:13 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 04:41:41PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> >>
> >>Allow userptr objects to be created and used via libdrm_intel.
> >>
> >>At the moment tiling and mapping to GTT aperture is not supported
> >>due hardware limitations across different generations and uncertainty
> >>about its usefulness.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> >>---
> >> include/drm/i915_drm.h | 16 +++++
> >> intel/intel_bufmgr.c | 13 ++++
> >> intel/intel_bufmgr.h | 5 ++
> >> intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> intel/intel_bufmgr_priv.h | 12 +++-
> >> 5 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >Apart from couple of remarks below I couldn't find anything that would
> >prevent merging this. Well, except maybe that it'd be very nice to have
> >some feedback from someone using it, we do have an API/ABI guarantee on
> >libdrm after all.
>
> Looks like I've forgotten to reply to this. I did address the other
> review comments and sent out a v2 back then.
>
> But for what users are concerned, apart from internal ones who have
> been using this API for some years now, I don't know of any.
Well, considering this is only a wrapper of an ioctl() already
upstreamed, I'm inclined to just push it as is. Daniel any thoughts?
--
Damien
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list