[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix possible overflow when recording semaphore states.
Damien Lespiau
damien.lespiau at intel.com
Fri Jul 18 18:12:40 CEST 2014
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 02:05:16AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> semaphore _sync_seqno, _seqno and _mbox are smaller than number of rings.
> This optimization is to remove the ring itself from the list and the logic to do that
> is at intel_ring_sync_index as below:
>
> /*
> * rcs -> 0 = vcs, 1 = bcs, 2 = vecs, 3 = vcs2;
> * vcs -> 0 = bcs, 1 = vecs, 2 = vcs2, 3 = rcs;
> * bcs -> 0 = vecs, 1 = vcs2. 2 = rcs, 3 = vcs;
> * vecs -> 0 = vcs2, 1 = rcs, 2 = vcs, 3 = bcs;
> * vcs2 -> 0 = rcs, 1 = vcs, 2 = bcs, 3 = vecs;
> */
>
> v2: Skip when from == to (Damien).
> v3: avoid computing idx when from == to (Damien).
> use ring == to instead of ring->id == to->id (Damien).
> use continue instead of return (Rodrigo).
>
> Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>
> Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
I guess there are still some details that look weird:
- idx's scope could be reduced to the loop
- there's still some code that is executed on the skipped iteration
that doesn't need to be.
But I believe we shouldn't overflow now at least, so, whether you can be
bothered with those last 2 comments or not:
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>
--
Damien
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> index 9faebbc..1efcf1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> @@ -764,8 +764,8 @@ static void gen8_record_semaphore_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
> struct drm_i915_error_ring *ering)
> {
> - struct intel_engine_cs *useless;
> - int i;
> + struct intel_engine_cs *to;
> + int i, idx;
>
> if (!i915_semaphore_is_enabled(dev_priv->dev))
> return;
> @@ -776,13 +776,18 @@ static void gen8_record_semaphore_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> dev_priv->semaphore_obj,
> &dev_priv->gtt.base);
>
> - for_each_ring(useless, dev_priv, i) {
> + for_each_ring(to, dev_priv, i) {
> u16 signal_offset =
> (GEN8_SIGNAL_OFFSET(ring, i) & PAGE_MASK) / 4;
> u32 *tmp = error->semaphore_obj->pages[0];
>
> - ering->semaphore_mboxes[i] = tmp[signal_offset];
> - ering->semaphore_seqno[i] = ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[i];
> + if (ring == to)
> + continue;
> +
> + idx = intel_ring_sync_index(ring, to);
> +
> + ering->semaphore_mboxes[idx] = tmp[signal_offset];
> + ering->semaphore_seqno[idx] = ring->semaphore.sync_seqno[idx];
> }
> }
>
> --
> 1.9.3
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list