[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/8] drm/i915: Returning from increase/decrease of pllclock when invalid

[Daniel Vetter]

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 03:23:42PM +0530, sonika.jindal at intel.com wrote:
> From: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal at intel.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 442d8ba..f6cf9bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -8783,7 +8783,7 @@ static void intel_increase_pllclock(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	int dpll_reg = DPLL(pipe);
>  	int dpll;
>  
> -	if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
> +	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5 && !IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))

Same as with the previous patch.
-Daniel

>  		return;
>  
>  	if (!dev_priv->lvds_downclock_avail)
> @@ -8811,7 +8811,7 @@ static void intel_decrease_pllclock(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>  	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
>  
> -	if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
> +	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5 && !IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
>  		return;
>  
>  	if (!dev_priv->lvds_downclock_avail)
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch