[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] Displayport compliance testing

[Jesse Barnes]

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:53:44 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> > Are you saying
> > you'll reject this approach entirely?
> 
> I'm saying that I don't see terrible lot of value in adding a bunch of
> code for a sticker, and that we should look into making it actually
> useful by testing the paths that end-users end up using. And we have
> to keep this working once it's merged.
> 
> But if it doesn't make sense to make this sticker useful while still
> being able to get it then I'll reconsider.

Yeah I think it depends on the test.  We're supposed to go through
existing paths for testing e.g. link training with different params
(though with a fixed fb and mode), so getting coverage there is
something we want regardless.  But getting something like probing
covered as part of the compliance testing may be something else
entirely...

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center