[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel-gpu-tools: skip gem_mmap_offset_exhaustion on Android

[Daniel Vetter]

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 09:14:51AM +0000, Gore, Tim wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel
> > Vetter
> > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 10:07 AM
> > To: Gore, Tim
> > Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org; daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-gpu-tools: skip gem_mmap_offset_exhaustion on
> > Android
> > 
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:00:19AM +0100, tim.gore at intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Tim Gore <tim.gore at intel.com>
> > >
> > > gem_mmap_offset_exhaustion relies on purgeable memory allocations
> > > getting swapped out, freeing up physical memory for further
> > > allocations. On Android we have no swap partition so this cannot
> > > happen and the test gets killed by the low memory killer before mmap
> > > offset exhaustion can happen, thus defeating the tests purpose.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tim Gore <tim.gore at intel.com>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 	/* we happily leak objects to exhaust mmap offset space, the kernel
> > will
> > 	 * reap backing storage. */
> > 	gem_madvise(fd, handle, I915_MADV_DONTNEED);
> > 
> > There's really no way you should be able to run out of memory. I suspect
> > android kernel's will fall over even with swap.
> > -Daniel
> > 
> Well, not sure I fully understand how GEM works, but I can clearly see the free memory
> Shrinking until the OOM killer steps in. Since the bo's are not destroyed, surely the only
> Way for the physical memory to be reclaimed is if it gets swapped out, which Android
> Wont do. Perhaps I misunderstand "purgeable". Should kswapd free such memory?

Well that's how i915 is designed. The shrinker is officially the right
interface for the core vm to tell various other pieces in the kernel when
they should tighten up. If the lowmemkiller in android is a bit too
enthusiastic about this and starts shooting down random process even
before we run out of memory for real then that's a design-screw up.

I've never looked at it, but a possible fix might be to remove the
lowmemkiller from the shrinker and instead wire it up as a true OOM
callback.

Disabling the test because memory pressure handling on android is busted
is certainly not the right fix.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch