[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/i915: State readout and cross-checking for dp_m2_n2
Vandana Kannan
vandana.kannan at intel.com
Mon Jun 16 11:45:12 CEST 2014
On Jun-13-2014 7:42 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 22 May 2014, Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan at intel.com> wrote:
>> Adding relevant read out comparison code, in check_crtc_state, for the new
>> member of crtc_config, dp_m2_n2, which was introduced to store link_m_n
>> values for a DP downclock mode (if available). Suggested by Daniel.
>>
>> v2: Changed patch title.
>> Daniel's review comments incorporated.
>> Added relevant state readout code for M2_N2. dp_m2_n2 comparison to be done
>> only when high RR is not in use (This is because alternate m_n register
>> programming will be done only when low RR is being used).
>>
>> v3: Modified call to get_m2_n2 which had dp_m_n as param by mistake.
>> Compare dp_m_n and dp_m2_n2 for gen 7 and below. compare the structures
>> based on DRRS state for gen 8 and above.
>> Save and restore M2 N2 registers for gen 7 and below
>>
>> v4: For Gen>=8, check M_N registers against dp_m_n and dp_m2_n2 as there is
>> only one set of M_N registers
>>
>> v5: Removed the chunk which saves and restores M2_N2 registers. Modified
>> get_m_n() to get M2_N2 registers as well. Modified the macro which compares
>> hw.dp_m_n against sw.dp_m2_n2/sw.dp_m_n for gen > 8.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan at intel.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index cf3ad87..d593897 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -6945,7 +6945,8 @@ static void intel_pch_transcoder_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>>
>> static void intel_cpu_transcoder_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> enum transcoder transcoder,
>> - struct intel_link_m_n *m_n)
>> + struct intel_link_m_n *m_n,
>> + struct intel_link_m_n *m2_n2)
>> {
>> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
>> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> @@ -6959,6 +6960,15 @@ static void intel_cpu_transcoder_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> m_n->gmch_n = I915_READ(PIPE_DATA_N1(transcoder));
>> m_n->tu = ((I915_READ(PIPE_DATA_M1(transcoder))
>> & TU_SIZE_MASK) >> TU_SIZE_SHIFT) + 1;
>> + if (m2_n2 && INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 8) {
>> + m2_n2->link_m = I915_READ(PIPE_LINK_M2(transcoder));
>> + m2_n2->link_n = I915_READ(PIPE_LINK_N2(transcoder));
>> + m2_n2->gmch_m = I915_READ(PIPE_DATA_M2(transcoder))
>> + & ~TU_SIZE_MASK;
>> + m2_n2->gmch_n = I915_READ(PIPE_DATA_N2(transcoder));
>> + m2_n2->tu = ((I915_READ(PIPE_DATA_M2(transcoder))
>> + & TU_SIZE_MASK) >> TU_SIZE_SHIFT) + 1;
>> + }
>> } else {
>> m_n->link_m = I915_READ(PIPE_LINK_M_G4X(pipe));
>> m_n->link_n = I915_READ(PIPE_LINK_N_G4X(pipe));
>> @@ -6977,14 +6987,15 @@ void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> intel_pch_transcoder_get_m_n(crtc, &pipe_config->dp_m_n);
>> else
>> intel_cpu_transcoder_get_m_n(crtc, pipe_config->cpu_transcoder,
>> - &pipe_config->dp_m_n);
>> + &pipe_config->dp_m_n,
>> + &pipe_config->dp_m2_n2);
>> }
>>
>> static void ironlake_get_fdi_m_n_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> struct intel_crtc_config *pipe_config)
>> {
>> intel_cpu_transcoder_get_m_n(crtc, pipe_config->cpu_transcoder,
>> - &pipe_config->fdi_m_n);
>> + &pipe_config->fdi_m_n, NULL);
>> }
>>
>> static void ironlake_get_pfit_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> @@ -9485,6 +9496,15 @@ static void intel_dump_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> pipe_config->dp_m_n.gmch_m, pipe_config->dp_m_n.gmch_n,
>> pipe_config->dp_m_n.link_m, pipe_config->dp_m_n.link_n,
>> pipe_config->dp_m_n.tu);
>> +
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("dp: %i, gmch_m2: %u, gmch_n2: %u, link_m2: %u, link_n2: %u, tu2: %u\n",
>> + pipe_config->has_dp_encoder,
>> + pipe_config->dp_m2_n2.gmch_m,
>> + pipe_config->dp_m2_n2.gmch_n,
>> + pipe_config->dp_m2_n2.link_m,
>> + pipe_config->dp_m2_n2.link_n,
>> + pipe_config->dp_m2_n2.tu);
>> +
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("requested mode:\n");
>> drm_mode_debug_printmodeline(&pipe_config->requested_mode);
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("adjusted mode:\n");
>> @@ -9867,6 +9887,22 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(struct drm_device *dev,
>> return false; \
>> }
>>
>> +/* This is required for BDW+ where there is only one set of registers for
>> + * switching between high and low RR.
>> + * This macro can be used whenever a comparison has to be made between one
>> + * hw state and multiple sw state variables.
>> + */
>> +#define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I_ALT(name, alt_name) \
>> + if ((current_config->name != pipe_config->name) && \
>> + (current_config->alt_name != pipe_config->name)) { \
>> + DRM_ERROR("mismatch in " #name " " \
>> + "(expected %i or %i, found %i)\n", \
>> + current_config->name, \
>> + current_config->alt_name, \
>> + pipe_config->name); \
>> + return false; \
>> + }
>> +
>> #define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS(name, mask) \
>> if ((current_config->name ^ pipe_config->name) & (mask)) { \
>> DRM_ERROR("mismatch in " #name "(" #mask ") " \
>> @@ -9899,11 +9935,26 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(struct drm_device *dev,
>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(fdi_m_n.tu);
>>
>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(has_dp_encoder);
>> - PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.gmch_m);
>> - PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.gmch_n);
>> - PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.link_m);
>> - PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.link_n);
>> - PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.tu);
>> +
>> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 8) {
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.gmch_m);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.gmch_n);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.link_m);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.link_n);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.tu);
>> +
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m2_n2.gmch_m);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m2_n2.gmch_n);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m2_n2.link_m);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m2_n2.link_n);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m2_n2.tu);
>> + } else {
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I_ALT(dp_m_n.gmch_m, dp_m2_n2.gmch_m);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I_ALT(dp_m_n.gmch_n, dp_m2_n2.gmch_n);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I_ALT(dp_m_n.link_m, dp_m2_n2.link_m);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I_ALT(dp_m_n.link_n, dp_m2_n2.link_n);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I_ALT(dp_m_n.tu, dp_m2_n2.tu);
>
> If there's no downclock mode (e.g. because it's not eDP), this now
> accepts register value 0 as okay for each state check. That's not cool.
>
> Perhaps drrs state should be part of pipe config.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
Ok, shall I go ahead with the following approach?
pipe_config{
drrs_state;
}
in pipe_config_compare() {
if gen < 8 {
compare dp_m1_n1
if drrs_state == seamless
compare hw.dp_m2_n2 and sw.dp_m2_n2
/* this drrs_state would be set only in edp_init_connector and only when
a downclock_mode is found */
}
else
compare hw.dp_m_n and sw.dp_m_n or sw.dp_m2_n2
}
drrs_state is stored in vbt struct and intel_dp as of now. some changes
would be required around this to avoid saving this state at a third
place (pipe_config).
option 1. move drrs_state from intel_dp to dev_priv.
option 2. move drrs_state from intel_dp to pipe_config.
with the above changes, the patches accessing intel_dp->drrs_state would
require changes.
Please let me know your inputs on this.
-Vandana
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> + }
>>
>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(adjusted_mode.crtc_hdisplay);
>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal);
>> @@ -9980,6 +10031,7 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(struct drm_device *dev,
>>
>> #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X
>> #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I
>> +#undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I_ALT
>> #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_FLAGS
>> #undef PIPE_CONF_CHECK_CLOCK_FUZZY
>> #undef PIPE_CONF_QUIRK
>> --
>> 1.9.3
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list