[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/53] drm/i915/bdw: Populate LR contexts (somewhat)
Volkin, Bradley D
bradley.d.volkin at intel.com
Mon Jun 23 17:05:44 CEST 2014
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 05:42:50AM -0700, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Volkin, Bradley D
> > > + reg_state[CTX_RING_HEAD+1] = 0;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_RING_TAIL] = RING_TAIL(ring->mmio_base);
> > > + reg_state[CTX_RING_TAIL+1] = 0;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_RING_BUFFER_START] = RING_START(ring-
> > >mmio_base);
> > > + reg_state[CTX_RING_BUFFER_START+1] =
> > i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(ring_obj);
> > > + reg_state[CTX_RING_BUFFER_CONTROL] = RING_CTL(ring-
> > >mmio_base);
> > > + reg_state[CTX_RING_BUFFER_CONTROL+1] = (31 * PAGE_SIZE) |
> > > +RING_VALID;
> >
> > The size here doesn't look right to me. Shouldn't it be (number of pages - 1)?
> > See init_ring_common()
>
> But that´s exactly what it is, right?
>
> Our ringbuf->size = 32 * PAGE_SIZE;
> so we are setting 31 * PAGE_SIZE
Ok, on closer inspection, the result is correct because the Buffer Length
field happens to be bits 20:12. But it looked to me like a size-in-bytes
rather than the encoding I expected. So I guess I'd prefer that we do it
as in init_ring_common(), using ring_obj->base.size and the RING_NR_PAGES
mask so that it's a bit more obvious what's going on.
Thanks,
Brad
>
> > > + reg_state[CTX_BB_HEAD_U] = ring->mmio_base + 0x168;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_BB_HEAD_U+1] = 0;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_BB_HEAD_L] = ring->mmio_base + 0x140;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_BB_HEAD_L+1] = 0;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_BB_STATE] = ring->mmio_base + 0x110;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_BB_STATE+1] = (1<<5);
> > > + reg_state[CTX_SECOND_BB_HEAD_U] = ring->mmio_base + 0x11c;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_SECOND_BB_HEAD_U+1] = 0;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_SECOND_BB_HEAD_L] = ring->mmio_base + 0x114;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_SECOND_BB_HEAD_L+1] = 0;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_SECOND_BB_STATE] = ring->mmio_base + 0x118;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_SECOND_BB_STATE+1] = 0;
> > > + if (ring->id == RCS) {
> > > + reg_state[CTX_BB_PER_CTX_PTR] = ring->mmio_base +
> > 0x1c0;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_BB_PER_CTX_PTR+1] = 0;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_RCS_INDIRECT_CTX] = ring->mmio_base +
> > 0x1c4;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_RCS_INDIRECT_CTX+1] = 0;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_RCS_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET] = ring-
> > >mmio_base + 0x1c8;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_RCS_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET+1] = 0;
> > > + }
> > > + reg_state[CTX_LRI_HEADER_1] = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(9);
> > > + reg_state[CTX_LRI_HEADER_1] |= MI_LRI_FORCE_POSTED;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_CTX_TIMESTAMP] = ring->mmio_base + 0x3a8;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_CTX_TIMESTAMP+1] = 0;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP3_UDW] = GEN8_RING_PDP_UDW(ring, 3);
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP3_LDW] = GEN8_RING_PDP_LDW(ring, 3);
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP2_UDW] = GEN8_RING_PDP_UDW(ring, 2);
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP2_LDW] = GEN8_RING_PDP_LDW(ring, 2);
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP1_UDW] = GEN8_RING_PDP_UDW(ring, 1);
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP1_LDW] = GEN8_RING_PDP_LDW(ring, 1);
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP0_UDW] = GEN8_RING_PDP_UDW(ring, 0);
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP0_LDW] = GEN8_RING_PDP_LDW(ring, 0);
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP3_UDW+1] = (u64)ppgtt->pd_dma_addr[3] >> 32;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP3_LDW+1] = ppgtt->pd_dma_addr[3];
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP2_UDW+1] = (u64)ppgtt->pd_dma_addr[2] >> 32;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP2_LDW+1] = ppgtt->pd_dma_addr[2];
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP1_UDW+1] = (u64)ppgtt->pd_dma_addr[1] >> 32;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP1_LDW+1] = ppgtt->pd_dma_addr[1];
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP0_UDW+1] = (u64)ppgtt->pd_dma_addr[0] >> 32;
> > > + reg_state[CTX_PDP0_LDW+1] = ppgtt->pd_dma_addr[0];
> >
> > Are we able to use upper_32_bits() and lower_32_bits() for these?
>
> ACK
>
> -- Oscar
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list