[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/21] drm/i915: factor out intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting_nolock

[Imre Deak]

Needed by the next patch, wanting to set the underrun reporting as part
of a bigger dev_priv->irq_lock'ed sequence.

Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 9d9309c..bc94cfb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -387,17 +387,14 @@ static void cpt_set_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct drm_device *dev,
  *
  * Returns the previous state of underrun reporting.
  */
-bool intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct drm_device *dev,
-					   enum pipe pipe, bool enable)
+bool intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting_nolock(struct drm_device *dev,
+						  enum pipe pipe, bool enable)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 	struct drm_crtc *crtc = dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe];
 	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
-	unsigned long flags;
 	bool ret;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, flags);
-
 	ret = !intel_crtc->cpu_fifo_underrun_disabled;
 
 	if (enable == ret)
@@ -415,7 +412,20 @@ bool intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct drm_device *dev,
 		broadwell_set_fifo_underrun_reporting(dev, pipe, enable);
 
 done:
+	return ret;
+}
+
+bool intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct drm_device *dev,
+					   enum pipe pipe, bool enable)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	bool ret;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, flags);
+	ret = intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting_nolock(dev, pipe, enable);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, flags);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.4