[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915: remove an indirection level on PC8 functions
Paulo Zanoni
przanoni at gmail.com
Sat Mar 8 00:08:10 CET 2014
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
After the latest changes, the indirection is useless.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 16 ++--------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 88348d6..e49c217 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -6812,12 +6812,6 @@ void __hsw_do_enable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
hsw_disable_lcpll(dev_priv, true, true);
}
-static void __hsw_enable_package_c8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
-{
- WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->pc8.lock));
- intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
-}
-
void __hsw_do_disable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
@@ -6845,19 +6839,13 @@ void __hsw_do_disable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
dev_priv->pc8.enabled = false;
}
-static void __hsw_disable_package_c8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
-{
- WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev_priv->pc8.lock));
- intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
-}
-
void hsw_enable_package_c8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
if (!HAS_PC8(dev_priv->dev))
return;
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pc8.lock);
- __hsw_enable_package_c8(dev_priv);
+ intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pc8.lock);
}
@@ -6867,7 +6855,7 @@ void hsw_disable_package_c8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
return;
mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pc8.lock);
- __hsw_disable_package_c8(dev_priv);
+ intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pc8.lock);
}
--
1.8.5.3
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list