[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/13] Gen7 batch buffer command parser
Volkin, Bradley D
bradley.d.volkin at intel.com
Wed Mar 12 19:02:24 CET 2014
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 05:41:06AM -0700, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> Hi Bradley -
>
> I've now rather meticulously reviewed what *is* in the command and
> register tables, and didn't spot any obvious errors.
Thanks Jani! I know it's a huge pain, so I appreciate you taking the
time for it.
>
> There is still the review of what is *not* in the command and register
> tables, but perhaps should be. This is important for two reasons:
>
> 1) Any command that should fail that's missing from the tables will
> pass.
>
> 2) Any command that has a non-standard length encoding that's missing
> from the tables will confuse the parser. Going out-of-sync with the
> commands may fail a good batch, or, worse, a command that should fail
> may pass.
>
> I'm thinking there's a certain fragility in this. In a sense, it would
> be better to whitelist everything, and fail everything else, to err on
> the safe side. But I'm guessing that's not really feasible.
There was some discussion on these issues previously. I think Daniel's
response here covers it.
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-January/039209.html
>
> Part of the fragility is the immense tediousness of the review... I know
> it gets easier with the incremental updates, but this first series is
> not fun. (You know, you could have planted a bug to reward me! Or did I
> miss it?! ;)
Yes, I'm afraid that I've taken all the fun for myself :p
Brad
>
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, bradley.d.volkin at intel.com wrote:
> > From: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin at intel.com>
> >
> > Certain OpenGL features (e.g. transform feedback, performance monitoring)
> > require userspace code to submit batches containing commands such as
> > MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM to access various registers. Unfortunately, some
> > generations of the hardware will noop these commands in "unsecure" batches
> > (which includes all userspace batches submitted via i915) even though the
> > commands may be safe and represent the intended programming model of the device.
> >
> > This series introduces a software command parser similar in operation to the
> > command parsing done in hardware for unsecure batches. However, the software
> > parser allows some operations that would be noop'd by hardware, if the parser
> > determines the operation is safe, and submits the batch as "secure" to prevent
> > hardware parsing. Currently the series implements this on IVB and HSW.
> >
> > The series has one piece of prep work, one patch for the parser logic, and a
> > handful of patches to fill out the tables which drive the parser. There are
> > follow-up patches to libdrm and to i-g-t. The i-g-t tests are basic and do not
> > test all of the commands used by the parser on the assumption that I'm likely
> > to make the same mistakes in both the parser and the test.
> >
> > I've previously run the i-g-t gem_* tests, the piglit quick tests, and generally
> > used Ubuntu 13.10 IVB and HSW systems with the parser running. Aside from a
> > failure described below, I did not see any regressions.
> >
> > At this point there are a couple of required/potential improvements.
> >
> > 1) Chained batches. The parser currently allows MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START commands
> > in userspace batches without parsing them. The media driver uses chained
> > batches, so a solution is required. I'm still working through the
> > requirements but don't want to continue delaying the review process for what
> > I have so far.
> > 2) Command buffer copy. To avoid CPU modifications to buffers after parsing, and
> > to avoid GPU modifications to buffers via EUs or commands in the batch, we
> > should copy the userspace batch buffer to memory that userspace does not
> > have access to, map it into GGTT, and execute that batch buffer. I have a
> > sense of how to do this for 1st-level batches, but it may need changes to
> > tie in with the chained batch parsing, so I've again held off.
> > 3) Coherency. I've previously found a coherency issue on VLV when reading the
> > batch buffer from the CPU during execbuffer2. Userspace writes the batch via
> > pwrite fast path before calling execbuffer2. The parser reads stale data.
> > This works fine on IVB and HSW, so I believe it's an LLC vs. non-LLC issue.
> > It's possible that the shmem pread refactoring fixes this, I just have not
> > been able to retest due to lack of a VLV system.
> >
> > v2:
> > - Significantly reorder series
> > - Scan secure batches (i.e. I915_EXEC_SECURE)
> > - Check that parser tables are sorted during init
> > - Fixed gem_cpu_reloc regression
> > - HAS_CMD_PARSER -> CMD_PARSER_VERSION getparam
> > - Additional tests
> >
> > v3:
> > - Don't actually send batches as secure yet
> > - Improved documentation and commenting
> > - Many other small cleanups throughout
> >
> > Brad Volkin (13):
> > drm/i915: Refactor shmem pread setup
> > drm/i915: Implement command buffer parsing logic
> > drm/i915: Initial command parser table definitions
> > drm/i915: Reject privileged commands
> > drm/i915: Allow some privileged commands from master
> > drm/i915: Add register whitelists for mesa
> > drm/i915: Add register whitelist for DRM master
> > drm/i915: Enable register whitelist checks
> > drm/i915: Reject commands that explicitly generate interrupts
> > drm/i915: Enable PPGTT command parser checks
> > drm/i915: Reject commands that would store to global HWS page
> > drm/i915: Add a CMD_PARSER_VERSION getparam
> > drm/i915: Enable command parsing by default
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c | 918 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 3 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 103 ++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 51 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 18 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 5 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 96 +++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 2 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 32 +
> > include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 1 +
> > 11 files changed, 1216 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c
> >
> > --
> > 1.8.3.2
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list