[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] tests/pm_rps: load harder
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Fri Mar 14 16:47:44 CET 2014
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 09:41:13AM -0500, Jeff McGee wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:27:48AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Big core platforms need some seriuos omph to break a sweat.
> >
> > This fixes min-max-config-loaded here on my ivb.
> >
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75146
> > Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> > ---
> > tests/pm_rps.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/pm_rps.c b/tests/pm_rps.c
> > index fc6bac647f4a..b5dd494443ff 100644
> > --- a/tests/pm_rps.c
> > +++ b/tests/pm_rps.c
> > @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ static struct load_helper {
> > enum load load;
> > bool exit;
> > struct igt_helper_process igt_proc;
> > + drm_intel_bo *src, *dst;
> > } lh;
> >
> > static void load_helper_signal_handler(int sig)
> > @@ -195,6 +196,7 @@ static void emit_store_dword_imm(uint32_t val)
> > }
> >
> > #define LOAD_HELPER_PAUSE_USEC 500
> > +#define LOAD_HELPER_BO_SIZE (16*1024*1024)
> > static void load_helper_set_load(enum load load)
> > {
> > assert(lh.igt_proc.running);
> > @@ -226,6 +228,10 @@ static void load_helper_run(enum load load)
> > signal(SIGUSR2, load_helper_signal_handler);
> >
> > while (!lh.exit) {
> > + if (lh.load == HIGH)
> > + intel_copy_bo(lh.batch, lh.dst, lh.dst,
> > + LOAD_HELPER_BO_SIZE);
> > +
> Did you mean to use lh.src here?
> > emit_store_dword_imm(val);
> > intel_batchbuffer_flush_on_ring(lh.batch, 0);
> > val++;
> > @@ -270,6 +276,13 @@ static void load_helper_init(void)
> > lh.target_buffer = drm_intel_bo_alloc(lh.bufmgr, "target bo",
> > 4096, 4096);
> > igt_assert(lh.target_buffer);
> > +
> > + lh.dst = drm_intel_bo_alloc(lh.bufmgr, "dst bo",
> > + LOAD_HELPER_BO_SIZE, 4096);
> > + igt_assert(lh.dst);
> > + lh.src = drm_intel_bo_alloc(lh.bufmgr, "src bo",
> > + LOAD_HELPER_BO_SIZE, 4096);
> > + igt_assert(lh.src);
> > }
> >
> > static void load_helper_deinit(void)
> Should we free these in load_helper_deinit?
I've thrown a fixup patch on top with these two things fixed. Thanks a lot
for your feedback.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list