[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: bdw expands ACTHD to 64bit

[Chris Wilson]

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 04:06:38PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:54:48PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > As Broadwell has an increased virtual address size, it requires more
> > than 32 bits to store offsets into its address space. This includes the
> > debug registers to track the current HEAD of the individual rings, which
> > may be anywhere within the per-process address spaces. In order to find
> > the full location, we need to read the high bits from a second register.
> > We then also need to expand our storage to keep track of the larger
> > address.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky at intel.com>
> > Cc: Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton at ubuntu.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |  2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c   |  2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c         |  8 +++++---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h         |  1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h |  6 +++---
> >  6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index ed67b4abf9e3..ee913b63a945 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -354,12 +354,12 @@ struct drm_i915_error_state {
> >  		u32 ipeir;
> >  		u32 ipehr;
> >  		u32 instdone;
> > -		u32 acthd;
> >  		u32 bbstate;
> >  		u32 instpm;
> >  		u32 instps;
> >  		u32 seqno;
> >  		u64 bbaddr;
> > +		u64 acthd;
> >  		u32 fault_reg;
> >  		u32 faddr;
> >  		u32 rc_psmi; /* sleep state */
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > index b153a16ead0a..9519aa240614 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> > @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static void i915_ring_error_state(struct drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
> >  	err_printf(m, "  TAIL: 0x%08x\n", ring->tail);
> >  	err_printf(m, "  CTL: 0x%08x\n", ring->ctl);
> >  	err_printf(m, "  HWS: 0x%08x\n", ring->hws);
> > -	err_printf(m, "  ACTHD: 0x%08x\n", ring->acthd);
> > +	err_printf(m, "  ACTHD: 0x%08llx\n", ring->acthd);
> 
> %016x?
> 
> if (gen8)
> 	%016x
> ?

I wasn't sure either, but I thought since we didn't do anything special
for BBADDR, to leave ACTHD alone.

I wonder if it would help splitting it up, having to count 8 extra
leading zeros is going to be a nightmare (especially as the decoder
doesn't pad it right either...)

For reading, I think I would prefer
err_printf(m, "  ACTHD: 0x%016llx [0x%08x %08x]\n",
           ring->acthd, (u32)(ring->acthd>>32), (u32)(ring->acthd));

or maybe just
err_printf(m, "  ACTHD: 0x%08x %08x\n",
           (u32)(ring->acthd>>32), (u32)(ring->acthd));
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre