[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] tests/gem_exec_parse: Test for batches w/o MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:46:15AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:10:47PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 01:58:29PM -0800, bradley.d.volkin at intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin at intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/gem_exec_parse.c | 9 +++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_parse.c b/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
> > > index 9e90408..004c3bf 100644
> > > --- a/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
> > > +++ b/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
> > > @@ -257,6 +257,15 @@ igt_main
> > >  				      -EINVAL));
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > +	igt_subtest("batch-without-end") {
> > > +		uint32_t noop[1024] = { 0 };
> > > +		igt_assert(
> > > +			   exec_batch(fd, handle,
> > > +				      noop, sizeof(noop),
> > > +				      I915_EXEC_RENDER,
> > > +				      -EINVAL));
> > 
> > Cheekier would be
> > uint32_t empty[] = { MI_NOOP, MI_NOOP, MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END, 0 };
> > for_each_ring() {
> > 	igt_assert(exec_batch(fd, handle, empty, sizeof(empty), ring, 0));
> > 	igt_assert(exec_batch(fd, handle, empty, 8, ring, -EINVAL));
> > }
> 
> On this subject, it should be
> { INVALID, INVALID, NOOP, NOOP, END, 0}
> assert(exec(0,  4) == -EINVAL);
> assert(exec(0,  8) == -EINVAL);
> assert(exec(0, 12) == -EINVAL);
> assert(exec(4,  8) == -EINVAL);
> assert(exec(4, 12) == 0);
> assert(exec(8, 12) == 0);

Brad, care to throw this nasties into the test pond, too?
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch