[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/bdw: Implement Wa4x4STCOptimizationDisable:bdw

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Mar 26 23:45:04 CET 2014


On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:39:21PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:10:41PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:08:44PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 06:41:51PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote:
>> > > > Not implementing this W/A can lead to hangs.
>> > > >
>> > > > Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky at intel.com>
>> > > > Cc: Rafael Barbalho <rafael.barbalho at intel.com>
>> > > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>
>> > >
>> > > From reading the HSD, it's not a workaround. It was a spec bug. I
>> > > presume the workaround name came from the workaround database? If it did
>> > > not, I'd just drop any mention of "workaround." If it's in the
>> > > workaround database, maybe just leave it so we can check later.
>> > >
>> > > Either way:
>> > > Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net>
>> >
>> > Oh, and I think CC: stable
>>
>> Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
>> -Daniel
>
> You want/need this in bdw-backports?

Should take the normal stable backport path, so no need for special
handling. Well, if it doesn't conflict, I didn't check that ;-)
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list