[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Gracefully handle obj not bound to GGTT in is_pin_display

Mateo Lozano, Oscar oscar.mateo at intel.com
Mon May 12 11:05:45 CEST 2014


Hi Daniel,

Sorry, this fell through the cracks:

> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Gracefully handle obj not bound to
> GGTT in is_pin_display
> 
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:21:01PM +0100, oscar.mateo at intel.com wrote:
> > From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
> >
> > Otherwise, we do a NULL pointer dereference.
> >
> > I've seen this happen while handling an error in
> > i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane():
> >
> > If i915_gem_object_set_cache_level() fails, we call is_pin_display()
> > to handle the error. At this point, the object is still not pinned to
> > GGTT and maybe not even bound, so we have to check before we
> > dereference its GGTT vma.
> >
> > Issue: VIZ-3772
> > Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
> 
> Have you looked into provoking this with an igt testcase? On a hunch a busy
> load (to extend the race window) plus the usual interruptor trick to jump out of
> wait_seqno calls should be able to make this go kaboom on command. But I
> haven't analyzed the bug in detail.

AFAICT, the only sequence where this likely to happen (because we are handling a recently created object) is:

intelfb_alloc -> intel_pin_and_fence_fb_obj -> i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane -> i915_gem_object_set_cache_level -> is_pin_display

Now, I think intelfb_alloc only happens during bootup, so reproducing it on IGT would be difficult.
I still feel the fix is valid though :)

-- Oscar



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list