[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Ringbuffer signal func for the second BSD ring
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Mon May 12 21:04:07 CEST 2014
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 01:44:59PM +0100, oscar.mateo at intel.com wrote:
> From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
>
> This is missing in:
>
> commit 78325f2d270897c9ee0887125b7abb963eb8efea
> Author: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky at intel.com>
> Date: Tue Apr 29 14:52:29 2014 -0700
>
> drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func
>
> Looks to me like a rebase side-effect...
>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. Iirc there's been a regression
report too. Anyone know the bugzilla?
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 9907d66..203fa2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -2182,6 +2182,7 @@ int intel_init_bsd2_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
> ring->dispatch_execbuffer =
> gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
> ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
> + ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal;
> /*
> * The current semaphore is only applied on the pre-gen8. And there
> * is no bsd2 ring on the pre-gen8. So now the semaphore_register
> --
> 1.9.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list