[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: State readout and cross-checking for dp_m2_n2
Vandana Kannan
vandana.kannan at intel.com
Tue May 13 10:26:04 CEST 2014
On May-12-2014 3:57 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 01:49:31PM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:
>> Adding relevant read out comparison code, in check_crtc_state, for the new
>> member of crtc_config, dp_m2_n2, which was introduced to store link_m_n
>> values for a DP downclock mode (if available). Suggested by Daniel.
>>
>> v2: Changed patch title.
>> Daniel's review comments incorporated.
>> Added relevant state readout code for M2_N2. dp_m2_n2 comparison to be done
>> only when high RR is not in use (This is because alternate m_n register
>> programming will be done only when low RR is being used).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan at intel.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 2 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 +
>> 4 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> index 0ad4e96..6784f0b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
>> @@ -1587,6 +1587,7 @@ void intel_ddi_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>> case TRANS_DDI_MODE_SELECT_DP_MST:
>> pipe_config->has_dp_encoder = true;
>> intel_dp_get_m_n(intel_crtc, pipe_config);
>> + intel_dp_get_m2_n2(intel_crtc, pipe_config);
>> break;
>> default:
>> break;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 797f01c..2e625eb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -6670,6 +6670,34 @@ void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> &pipe_config->dp_m_n);
>> }
>>
>> +void intel_dp_get_m2_n2(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> + struct intel_crtc_config *pipe_config)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> + enum transcoder transcoder = pipe_config->cpu_transcoder;
>> +
>> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) {
>> + intel_cpu_transcoder_get_m_n(crtc, transcoder,
>> + &pipe_config->dp_m_n);
>
> dm_m2_n2 surely? And why do we even want to do this?
>
My miss, will change this.
For Gen8, there is only one set of MN registers to be programmed for
high and low RR. Hence this check.
>> + } else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen > 6) {
>> + pipe_config->dp_m2_n2.link_m =
>> + I915_READ(PIPE_LINK_M2(transcoder));
>> + pipe_config->dp_m2_n2.link_n =
>> + I915_READ(PIPE_LINK_N2(transcoder));
>> + pipe_config->dp_m2_n2.gmch_m =
>> + I915_READ(PIPE_DATA_M2(transcoder))
>> + & ~TU_SIZE_MASK;
>> + pipe_config->dp_m2_n2.gmch_n =
>> + I915_READ(PIPE_DATA_N2(transcoder));
>> + pipe_config->dp_m2_n2.tu =
>> + ((I915_READ(PIPE_DATA_M2(transcoder))
>> + & TU_SIZE_MASK) >> TU_SIZE_SHIFT) + 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> +}
>>
>> +
>> static void ironlake_get_fdi_m_n_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> struct intel_crtc_config *pipe_config)
>> {
>> @@ -9169,6 +9197,15 @@ static void intel_dump_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> pipe_config->dp_m_n.gmch_m, pipe_config->dp_m_n.gmch_n,
>> pipe_config->dp_m_n.link_m, pipe_config->dp_m_n.link_n,
>> pipe_config->dp_m_n.tu);
>> +
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("dp: %i, gmch_m2: %u, gmch_n2: %u, link_m2: %u, link_n2: %u, tu2: %u\n",
>> + pipe_config->has_dp_encoder,
>> + pipe_config->dp_m2_n2.gmch_m,
>> + pipe_config->dp_m2_n2.gmch_n,
>> + pipe_config->dp_m2_n2.link_m,
>> + pipe_config->dp_m2_n2.link_n,
>> + pipe_config->dp_m2_n2.tu);
>> +
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("requested mode:\n");
>> drm_mode_debug_printmodeline(&pipe_config->requested_mode);
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("adjusted mode:\n");
>> @@ -9533,6 +9570,14 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(struct drm_device *dev,
>> struct intel_crtc_config *current_config,
>> struct intel_crtc_config *pipe_config)
>> {
>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> + struct intel_connector *intel_connector = dev_priv->drrs.connector;
>> + struct intel_encoder *encoder = (intel_connector != NULL) ?
>> + intel_attached_encoder(&intel_connector->base) :
>> + NULL;
>> + struct intel_dp *intel_dp = (encoder != NULL) ?
>> + enc_to_intel_dp(&encoder->base) : NULL;
>> +
>> #define PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X(name) \
>> if (current_config->name != pipe_config->name) { \
>> DRM_ERROR("mismatch in " #name " " \
>> @@ -9583,11 +9628,28 @@ intel_pipe_config_compare(struct drm_device *dev,
>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(fdi_m_n.tu);
>>
>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(has_dp_encoder);
>> - PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.gmch_m);
>> - PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.gmch_n);
>> - PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.link_m);
>> - PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.link_n);
>> - PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.tu);
>> +
>> +
>> + /* DP M1_N1 registers are used when DRRS is disabled or when high RR
>> + * is used. Else, DP M2_N2 registers are used. The following check
>> + * has been added to make sure a mismatch (if any) is displayed only
>> + * for a real difference and not because of DRRS state.
>> + */
>> + if ((dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type == DRRS_NOT_SUPPORTED) ||
>> + (dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type != DRRS_NOT_SUPPORTED && intel_dp &&
>> + intel_dp->drrs_state.refresh_rate_type == DRRS_HIGH_RR)) {
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.gmch_m);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.gmch_n);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.link_m);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.link_n);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m_n.tu);
>> + } else {
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m2_n2.gmch_m);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m2_n2.gmch_n);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m2_n2.link_m);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m2_n2.link_n);
>> + PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(dp_m2_n2.tu);
>> + }
>
> Can't we just check both dp_m_n and dp_m2_n2 always?
>
Daniel/Ville,
pipe_config->dp_m2_n2 is populated along with pipe_config->dp_m_n in
compute_config(). while pipe_config dp_m_n values are programmed into MN
registers during the mode set, dp_m2_n2 values are programmed only when
low RR is used.
Given this, when PIPE_CONF_CHECK is done for dp_m2_n2, it would show a
mismatch (struct contains values to be programmed but registers still
have 0) and return.
The reason these checks were added was to avoid the scenario in which a
mismatch is highlighted when there is no real failure at all. For
example, DRRS is enabled on boot but the scenario to trigger low RR has
not yet occurred, dp_m2_n2 has been computed but M2_N2 registers are not
programmed in this case. There will be a mismatch in the pipe_config check.
Changes can be made to set M2_N2 registers when dp_m2_n2 is populated
and toggle the bit (PIPECONF bit) to switch between high and low RR, but
this becomes invalid for gen8 and above where only 1 set of MN registers
are available.
Please suggest some other way to handle this.
May be a quirk like the following?
/*
* FIXME: BIOS likes to set up a cloned config with lvds+external
* screen. Since we don't yet re-compute the pipe config when moving
* just the lvds port away to another pipe the sw tracking won't
match.
*
* Proper atomic modesets with recomputed global state will fix
this.
* Until then just don't check gmch state for inherited modes.
*/
if (!PIPE_CONF_QUIRK(PIPE_CONFIG_QUIRK_INHERITED_MODE)) {
Or go ahead with checking dp_m_n and dp_m2_n2 always ?
Please let me know..
-Vandana
>>
>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(adjusted_mode.crtc_hdisplay);
>> PIPE_CONF_CHECK_I(adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> index 34ed143..9aa4dcd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -1511,6 +1511,8 @@ static void intel_dp_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>
>> intel_dp_get_m_n(crtc, pipe_config);
>>
>> + intel_dp_get_m2_n2(crtc, pipe_config);
>> +
>> if (port == PORT_A) {
>> if ((I915_READ(DP_A) & DP_PLL_FREQ_MASK) == DP_PLL_FREQ_160MHZ)
>> pipe_config->port_clock = 162000;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> index d8b540b..1013f70 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> @@ -763,6 +763,8 @@ void hsw_enable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> void hsw_disable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> void intel_dp_get_m_n(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> struct intel_crtc_config *pipe_config);
>> +void intel_dp_get_m2_n2(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
>> + struct intel_crtc_config *pipe_config);
>> int intel_dotclock_calculate(int link_freq, const struct intel_link_m_n *m_n);
>> void
>> ironlake_check_encoder_dotclock(const struct intel_crtc_config *pipe_config,
>> --
>> 1.9.2
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list