[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] tests/kms_flip: test a fb backed by a bo too big for its own good
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Fri May 16 14:04:21 CEST 2014
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:08:51PM +0100, oscar.mateo at intel.com wrote:
> From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
>
> This is a "review by igt test" for a bug located in
> i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane and fixed by:
>
> commit 392013bdd4b6128795e33c84bd6d6d3fd66ff0a3
> Author: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
> Date: Fri May 16 11:23:12 2014 +0100
>
> drm/i915: Gracefully handle obj not bound to GGTT in is_pin_display
>
> Otherwise, we do a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> I've seen this happen while handling an error in
> i915_gem_object_pin_to_display_plane():
>
> If i915_gem_object_set_cache_level() fails, we call is_pin_display()
> to handle the error. At this point, the object is still not pinned
> to GGTT and maybe not even bound, so we have to check before we
> dereference its GGTT vma.
>
> v2: Chris Wilson says restoring the old value is easier, but that
> is_pin_display is useful as a theory of operation. Take the solomonic
> decision: at least this way is_pin_display is a little more robust
> (until Chris can kill it off).
>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_flip.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c
> index bb4f71d..7296122 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_flip.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_flip.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@
> #define TEST_RPM (1 << 25)
> #define TEST_SUSPEND (1 << 26)
> #define TEST_TS_CONT (1 << 27)
> +#define TEST_BO_TOOBIG (1 << 28)
>
> #define EVENT_FLIP (1 << 0)
> #define EVENT_VBLANK (1 << 1)
> @@ -1208,6 +1209,84 @@ static void free_test_output(struct test_output *o)
> }
> }
>
> +static int create_bigbo_for_fb(int fd, int width, int height, int bpp,
> + bool tiled, uint32_t *gem_handle_ret,
> + unsigned *size_ret, unsigned *stride_ret)
> +{
> + uint32_t gem_handle;
> + int size, ret = 0;
> + unsigned stride;
> +
> + if (tiled) {
> + int v;
> +
> + v = width * bpp / 8;
> + for (stride = 512; stride < v; stride *= 2)
> + ;
> +
> + v = stride * height;
> + for (size = 1024*1024; size < v; size *= 2)
> + ;
> + } else {
> + /* Scan-out has a 64 byte alignment restriction */
> + stride = (width * (bpp / 8) + 63) & ~63;
> + size = stride * height;
> + }
> +
> + /* 256 MB is usually the maximum mappable aperture,
> + * (make it 4x times that to ensure failure) */
> + gem_handle = gem_create(fd, 4*256*1024*1024);
> +
> + if (tiled)
> + ret = __gem_set_tiling(fd, gem_handle, I915_TILING_X, stride);
> +
> + *stride_ret = stride;
> + *size_ret = size;
> + *gem_handle_ret = gem_handle;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned int igt_create_fb_with_bigbo(int fd, int width, int height,
> + uint32_t format, bool tiled,
> + struct igt_fb *fb)
> +{
> + uint32_t handles[4];
> + uint32_t pitches[4];
> + uint32_t offsets[4];
> + uint32_t fb_id;
> + int bpp;
> + int ret;
> +
> + memset(fb, 0, sizeof(*fb));
> +
> + bpp = igt_drm_format_to_bpp(format);
> + ret = create_bigbo_for_fb(fd, width, height, bpp, tiled,
> + &fb->gem_handle, &fb->size, &fb->stride);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + memset(handles, 0, sizeof(handles));
> + handles[0] = fb->gem_handle;
> + memset(pitches, 0, sizeof(pitches));
> + pitches[0] = fb->stride;
> + memset(offsets, 0, sizeof(offsets));
> + if (drmModeAddFB2(fd, width, height, format, handles, pitches,
> + offsets, &fb_id, 0) < 0) {
> + gem_close(fd, fb->gem_handle);
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + fb->width = width;
> + fb->height = height;
> + fb->tiling = tiled;
> + fb->drm_format = format;
> + fb->fb_id = fb_id;
> +
> + return fb_id;
> +}
Could we avoid a bit of code duplication with something like this?
create_bo_for_fb(..., bo_size)
{
...
if (bo_size == 0)
bo_size = size;
gem_handle = gem_create(fd, bo_size);
...
}
igt_create_fb_with_bo_size(xxx, bo_size)
{
...
create_bo_for_fb(..., bo_size);
...
}
igt_create_fb(xxx)
{
return igt_create_fb_with_bo_size(xxx, 0);
}
Otherwise looks pretty good.
> +
> static void run_test_on_crtc_set(struct test_output *o, int *crtc_idxs,
> int crtc_count, int duration_ms)
> {
> @@ -1252,9 +1331,15 @@ static void run_test_on_crtc_set(struct test_output *o, int *crtc_idxs,
> o->fb_ids[0] = igt_create_fb(drm_fd, o->fb_width, o->fb_height,
> igt_bpp_depth_to_drm_format(o->bpp, o->depth),
> tiled, &o->fb_info[0]);
> - o->fb_ids[1] = igt_create_fb(drm_fd, o->fb_width, o->fb_height,
> - igt_bpp_depth_to_drm_format(o->bpp, o->depth),
> - tiled, &o->fb_info[1]);
> + if (o->flags & TEST_BO_TOOBIG) {
> + o->fb_ids[1] = igt_create_fb_with_bigbo(drm_fd, o->fb_width, o->fb_height,
> + igt_bpp_depth_to_drm_format(o->bpp, o->depth),
> + tiled, &o->fb_info[1]);
> + } else {
> + o->fb_ids[1] = igt_create_fb(drm_fd, o->fb_width, o->fb_height,
> + igt_bpp_depth_to_drm_format(o->bpp, o->depth),
> + tiled, &o->fb_info[1]);
> + }
> o->fb_ids[2] = igt_create_fb(drm_fd, o->fb_width, o->fb_height,
> igt_bpp_depth_to_drm_format(o->bpp, o->depth),
> true, &o->fb_info[2]);
> @@ -1264,7 +1349,8 @@ static void run_test_on_crtc_set(struct test_output *o, int *crtc_idxs,
> igt_require(o->fb_ids[2]);
>
> paint_flip_mode(&o->fb_info[0], false);
> - paint_flip_mode(&o->fb_info[1], true);
> + if (!(o->flags & TEST_BO_TOOBIG))
> + paint_flip_mode(&o->fb_info[1], true);
> if (o->fb_ids[2])
> paint_flip_mode(&o->fb_info[2], true);
>
> @@ -1288,10 +1374,15 @@ static void run_test_on_crtc_set(struct test_output *o, int *crtc_idxs,
> if (o->flags & TEST_CHECK_TS)
> sleep(1);
>
> - igt_assert(do_page_flip(o, o->fb_ids[1], true) == 0);
> + if (o->flags & TEST_BO_TOOBIG) {
> + igt_assert(do_page_flip(o, o->fb_ids[1], true) == -E2BIG);
> + goto out;
> + } else
> + igt_assert(do_page_flip(o, o->fb_ids[1], true) == 0);
> wait_for_events(o);
>
> o->current_fb_id = 1;
> +
> if (o->flags & TEST_FLIP)
> o->flip_state.seq_step = 1;
> else
> @@ -1543,6 +1634,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> { 10, TEST_VBLANK | TEST_DPMS | TEST_SUSPEND | TEST_TS_CONT, "dpms-vs-suspend" },
> { 0, TEST_VBLANK | TEST_MODESET | TEST_RPM | TEST_TS_CONT, "modeset-vs-rpm" },
> { 0, TEST_VBLANK | TEST_MODESET | TEST_SUSPEND | TEST_TS_CONT, "modeset-vs-suspend" },
> + { 0, TEST_BO_TOOBIG | TEST_NO_2X_OUTPUT, "bo-too-big" },
> };
> int i;
>
> --
> 1.9.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list