[Intel-gfx] [RFC 24/25] drm/i915: Zero fill the request structure
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Mon Nov 3 12:02:21 CET 2014
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 03:55:21PM +0000, John Harrison wrote:
> On 19/10/2014 15:15, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:41:12PM +0100, John.C.Harrison at Intel.com wrote:
> >>From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
> >>
> >>For: VIZ-4377
> >>Signed-off-by: John.C.Harrison at Intel.com
> >I think this should be squashed (well, split first) into the relevant
> >earlier patches. Generally I much prefer kzalloc, and we use that almost
> >everywhere.
> >
> >Or does this silently fix some issue and doesn't tell?
> >-Daniel
> No, I just left it separate so as to change as little as possible in each
> individual patch. The original code did a kmalloc() of the request. That
> predates my changes. So if I did a km -> kz change in the middle of some
> other work I was assuming you would complain at me doing too much in a
> single patch. Whereas, the 'complete' field is the first time a zero fill
> becomes significant so it made sense (to me) to leave the switch to kz until
> here.
Makes sense, but this kind of explanation really should be in the commit
message.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list