[Intel-gfx] [RFC 3/5] drm/i915: Infrastructure for supporting different GGTT views per object

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 11/03/2014 05:35 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Anyway, that's why I didn't bother with polishing the enums etc. :)
>
> Well I think if we do add some new abstraction it should be polished.
> The point of abstraction is to hide details, and that's only possible
> if the abstraction is clean&polished and doesn't leak in any
> direction. Given that I've mastered in advanced abstract nonsene (i.e.
> math) I might have a bit a screwed view here ;-)

Don't think we were on the same page there. I just said I didn't bother 
with polish (int vs enum) _while_ the whole thing is in the design RFC 
stage. Not that it doesn't need to be polished when it's done.

Tvrtko