[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: PSR VLV/CHV: Introduce setup, enable and disable functions
R, Durgadoss
durgadoss.r at intel.com
Thu Nov 6 19:32:44 CET 2014
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
>Rodrigo Vivi
>Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 12:16 AM
>To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo
>Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: PSR VLV/CHV: Introduce setup,
>enable and disable functions
>
>The biggest difference from HSW/BDW PSR here is that VLV enable_source
>function enables PSR but let it in Inactive state. So it might be called
>on early stage along with setup and enable_sink ones.
>
>Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 161
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 145 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>index ac70b3a..335a711 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>@@ -2134,7 +2134,44 @@ static void intel_edp_psr_write_vsc(struct intel_dp
>*intel_dp,
> POSTING_READ(ctl_reg);
> }
>
>-static void intel_edp_psr_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>+/**
>+ * vlv_edp_psr_setup_vsc - Setup PSR related VSC aux registers on VLV+.
>+ * @intel_dp: DP struct
>+ *
>+ * On VLV we don't need to generate VSC. It auto generates according
>+ * EDP 1.3 spec, Table 3.10.
>+ * HB0 - Secondary Data Packet ID = 0
>+ * HB1 - Secondary Data Packet Type = 07h
>+ * HB2 - Bits 4:0 = Revision Number = 02h
>+ * Bits 7:5 = Reserved (all 0s)
>+ * HB3 - Bits 4:0 Number of Valid Data Bytes = 08h
>+ * Bits 7:5 Reserved
>+ * DB0 - Bits 7:4 Stereo Interface Method Specific Paramenter
>+ * Bits 3:0 Stereo Interface Method Code
>+ * DB1 - Bit 0 - PSR State (0 when Inactive / 1 when Active)
>+ * Bit 1 - Update RFB. (0 do not update RFB / 1 update RFB)
>+ * Bit 2 - CRC Valid. VLV always send 0 which
>+ * means CRC value in DB7:2 invalid
>+ * Bits 7:3 - Reserved
>+ * DB2-7 - CRC - don't care because DB1[2] always tells this is invalid.
>+ */
>+static void vlv_edp_psr_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>+{
>+ struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>+ struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
>+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>+ struct drm_crtc *crtc = intel_dig_port->base.base.crtc;
>+ enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
>+ uint32_t val;
>+
>+ /* VLV auto-generate VSC package as per EDP 1.3 spec, Table 3.10 */
>+ val = I915_READ(VLV_VSCSDP(pipe));
>+ val &= ~VLV_EDP_PSR_SDP_FREQ_MASK;
>+ val |= VLV_EDP_PSR_SDP_FREQ_EVFRAME;
>+ I915_WRITE(VLV_VSCSDP(pipe), val);
>+}
>+
>+static void hsw_edp_psr_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct edp_vsc_psr psr_vsc;
>
>@@ -2147,7 +2184,20 @@ static void intel_edp_psr_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp
>*intel_dp)
> intel_edp_psr_write_vsc(intel_dp, &psr_vsc);
> }
>
>-static void intel_edp_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>+/**
>+ * vlv_edp_psr_enable_sink - Enable PSR on Panel for VLV.
>+ * @intel_dp: DP struct
>+ *
>+ * This function enable PSR on Panel (Sink) side over DPCD write.
>+ */
>+static void vlv_edp_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>+{
>+ /* Enable PSR in sink */
>+ drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_EN_CFG,
>+ DP_PSR_ENABLE);
>+}
>+
>+static void hsw_edp_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
>@@ -2191,7 +2241,28 @@ static void intel_edp_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp
>*intel_dp)
> (aux_clock_divider << DP_AUX_CH_CTL_BIT_CLOCK_2X_SHIFT));
> }
>
>-static void intel_edp_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>+/**
>+ * vlv_edp_psr_enable_source - Enable PSR on VLV without activate it.
>+ * @intel_dp: DP struct
>+ *
>+ * This function do the transition from PSR_state 0 to PSR_state 1 that is
>+ * PSR Inactive one..
>+ */
>+static void vlv_edp_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>+{
>+ struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>+ struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
>+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>+ struct drm_crtc *crtc = dig_port->base.base.crtc;
>+ enum pipe pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
>+
>+ I915_WRITE(VLV_PSRCTL(pipe),
>+ VLV_EDP_PSR_SRC_TRANSMITTER_STATE |
I see we are keeping the source active during PSR.
Making this '0' may provide better power savings,
but we need to manage a lot of hassle during PSR exit..
(like Link training, DPIO/PLL bring up etc..)
>+ VLV_EDP_PSR_MODE_SW_TIMER |
>+ VLV_EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
>+}
>+
>+static void hsw_edp_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
>@@ -2276,7 +2347,7 @@ static void intel_edp_psr_do_enable(struct intel_dp
>*intel_dp)
> lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>
> /* Enable/Re-enable PSR on the host */
>- intel_edp_psr_enable_source(intel_dp);
>+ hsw_edp_psr_enable_source(intel_dp);
>
> dev_priv->psr.active = true;
> }
>@@ -2307,30 +2378,71 @@ void intel_edp_psr_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits = 0;
>
>- intel_edp_psr_setup_vsc(intel_dp);
>+ if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
>+ hsw_edp_psr_setup_vsc(intel_dp);
>+
>+ /* Avoid continuous PSR exit by masking memup and hpd */
>+ I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL(dev),
>EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
>+ EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD |
>EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP);
>
>- /* Avoid continuous PSR exit by masking memup and hpd */
>- I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL(dev),
>EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
>- EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD | EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP);
>+ /* Enable PSR on the panel */
>+ hsw_edp_psr_enable_sink(intel_dp);
>+ } else {
>+ vlv_edp_psr_setup_vsc(intel_dp);
>
>- /* Enable PSR on the panel */
>- intel_edp_psr_enable_sink(intel_dp);
>+ /* Enable PSR on the panel */
>+ vlv_edp_psr_enable_sink(intel_dp);
>+
>+ /* On HSW/BDW enable_source also means go to PSR entry/active
>+ * state as soon as idle_frame achieved and here would be
>+ * to soon. However on VLV enable_source just enable PSR
>+ * but let it on inactive state. So we might do this prior
>+ * to active transition, i.e. here.
>+ */
>+ vlv_edp_psr_enable_source(intel_dp);
>+ }
>
> dev_priv->psr.enabled = intel_dp;
> unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
> }
>
>-void intel_edp_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>+/**
>+ * vlv_edp_psr_disable - Disable PSR on VLV
>+ * @intel_dp: DP struct
>+ *
>+ * This function puts PSR VLV back to PSR_state 0 that is PSR Disabled.
I hope you meant 'puts VLV PSR'..
>+ */
>+static void vlv_edp_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
>- struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
>+ struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>+ struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev;
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>+ struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc =
>+ to_intel_crtc(intel_dig_port->base.base.crtc);
>+ uint32_t val;
>
>- mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>- if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
>- mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>- return;
>+ if (dev_priv->psr.active) {
>+ if (wait_for((I915_READ(VLV_PSRSTAT(intel_crtc->pipe)) &
>+ VLV_EDP_PSR_IN_TRANS) == 0, 250))
>+ WARN(1, "PSR transition took longer than expected\n");
The spec claims this waiting time as 250 micro seconds.
Looks like we are waiting for 250 ms.. No ?
Just curious, did you see this transition during testing ?
Thanks,
Durga
>+
>+ val = I915_READ(VLV_PSRCTL(intel_crtc->pipe));
>+ val &= ~VLV_EDP_PSR_ACTIVE_ENTRY;
>+ val &= ~VLV_EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
>+ val &= ~VLV_EDP_PSR_MODE_MASK;
>+ I915_WRITE(VLV_PSRCTL(intel_crtc->pipe), val);
>+
>+ dev_priv->psr.active = false;
>+ } else {
>+ WARN_ON(vlv_edp_is_psr_enabled_on_pipe(dev, intel_crtc-
>>pipe));
> }
>+}
>+
>+static void hsw_edp_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>+{
>+ struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
>+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>
> if (dev_priv->psr.active) {
> I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL(dev),
>@@ -2345,6 +2457,23 @@ void intel_edp_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> } else {
> WARN_ON(I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL(dev)) & EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
> }
>+}
>+
>+void intel_edp_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>+{
>+ struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
>+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>+
>+ mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>+ if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled) {
>+ mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>+ return;
>+ }
>+
>+ if (HAS_DDI(dev))
>+ hsw_edp_psr_disable(intel_dp);
>+ else
>+ vlv_edp_psr_disable(intel_dp);
>
> dev_priv->psr.enabled = NULL;
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>--
>1.9.3
>
>_______________________________________________
>Intel-gfx mailing list
>Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list