[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_exec_parse: Go OCD about C-style comments
Daniel Vetter
daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
Fri Nov 7 10:41:14 CET 2014
Cc: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
tests/gem_exec_parse.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/gem_exec_parse.c b/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
index e48b83a611b3..fff166a4954a 100644
--- a/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
+++ b/tests/gem_exec_parse.c
@@ -147,14 +147,15 @@ static void exec_split_batch(int fd, uint32_t *cmds,
const int alloc_size = 4096 * 2;
const int actual_start_offset = 4096-sizeof(uint32_t);
- // Allocate and fill a 2-page batch with noops
+ /* Allocate and fill a 2-page batch with noops */
cmd_bo = gem_create(fd, alloc_size);
gem_write(fd, cmd_bo, 0, noop, sizeof(noop));
gem_write(fd, cmd_bo, 4096, noop, sizeof(noop));
- // Write the provided commands such that the first dword
- // of the command buffer is the last dword of the first
- // page (i.e. the command is split across the two pages).
+ /* Write the provided commands such that the first dword
+ * of the command buffer is the last dword of the first
+ * page (i.e. the command is split across the two pages).
+ */
gem_write(fd, cmd_bo, actual_start_offset, cmds, size);
objs[0].handle = cmd_bo;
@@ -168,10 +169,11 @@ static void exec_split_batch(int fd, uint32_t *cmds,
execbuf.buffers_ptr = (uintptr_t)objs;
execbuf.buffer_count = 1;
- // NB: We want batch_start_offset and batch_len to point to the block
- // of the actual commands (i.e. at the last dword of the first page),
- // but have to adjust both the start offset and length to meet the
- // kernel driver's requirements on the alignment of those fields.
+ /* NB: We want batch_start_offset and batch_len to point to the block
+ * of the actual commands (i.e. at the last dword of the first page),
+ * but have to adjust both the start offset and length to meet the
+ * kernel driver's requirements on the alignment of those fields.
+ */
execbuf.batch_start_offset = actual_start_offset & ~0x7;
execbuf.batch_len =
ALIGN(size + actual_start_offset - execbuf.batch_start_offset,
@@ -318,14 +320,14 @@ igt_main
uint32_t pc[] = {
GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL,
PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE,
- 0, // To be patched
+ 0, /* To be patched */
0x12000000,
0,
MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END,
};
exec_batch_patched(fd, handle,
pc, sizeof(pc),
- 8, // patch offset,
+ 8, /* patch offset, */
0x12000000);
}
@@ -363,13 +365,13 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("registers") {
uint32_t lri_bad[] = {
MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM,
- 0, // disallowed register address
+ 0, /* disallowed register address */
0x12000000,
MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END,
};
uint32_t lri_ok[] = {
MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM,
- 0x5280, // allowed register address (SO_WRITE_OFFSET[0])
+ 0x5280, /* allowed register address (SO_WRITE_OFFSET[0]) */
0x1,
MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END,
};
@@ -388,7 +390,7 @@ igt_main
GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL,
(PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE |
PIPE_CONTROL_LRI_POST_OP),
- 0, // To be patched
+ 0, /* To be patched */
0x12000000,
0,
MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END,
@@ -410,7 +412,7 @@ igt_main
igt_subtest("cmd-crossing-page") {
uint32_t lri_ok[] = {
MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM,
- 0x5280, // allowed register address (SO_WRITE_OFFSET[0])
+ 0x5280, /* allowed register address (SO_WRITE_OFFSET[0]) */
0x1,
MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END,
};
@@ -467,14 +469,14 @@ igt_main
uint32_t pc[] = {
GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL,
PIPE_CONTROL_QW_WRITE,
- 0, // To be patched
+ 0, /* To be patched */
0x12000000,
0,
MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END,
};
exec_batch_chained(fd, handle,
pc, sizeof(pc),
- 8, // patch offset,
+ 8, /* patch offset, */
0x12000000);
}
--
2.1.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list