[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix comments about CHV snoop behaviour

[Daniel Vetter]

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 01:22:46AM -0800, shuang.he at intel.com wrote:
> Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he at intel.com)
> -------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
> Platform: baseline_drm_intel_nightly_pass_rate->patch_applied_pass_rate
> BYT: pass/total=290/291->290/291
> PNV: pass/total=352/356->356/356
> ILK: pass/total=371/372->371/372
> IVB: pass/total=545/546->544/546
> SNB: pass/total=424/425->424/425
> HSW: pass/total=579/579->579/579
> BDW: pass/total=434/435->434/435
> -------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
> test_platform: test_suite, test_case, result_with_drm_intel_nightly(count, machine_id...)...->result_with_patch_applied(count, machine_id)...
> PNV: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gen3_mixed_blits, DMESG_WARN(1, M23) -> PASS(4, M23)
> PNV: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gen3_render_mixed_blits, CRASH(1, M23) -> PASS(1, M23)
> PNV: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gen3_render_tiledx_blits, CRASH(1, M23) -> PASS(1, M23)
> PNV: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_gen3_render_tiledy_blits, CRASH(1, M23) -> PASS(1, M23)

These tests on pnv seem to be unstable and flip-flop between crash, dmesg
warn and pass. Is the machine dying perhaps or should we have some
additional filtering in -nightly results?
-Daniel

> IVB: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_cursor_crc_cursor-128x128-random, PASS(1, M4) -> DMESG_WARN(1, M21)PASS(3, M21)
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch