[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: add turbo boost trace point

[Jesse Barnes]

On 18 Nov 2014 19:15:18 -0800
shuang.he at intel.com wrote:

> Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he at intel.com)
> -------------------------------------Summary-------------------------------------
> Platform: baseline_drm_intel_nightly_pass_rate->patch_applied_pass_rate
> BYT: pass/total=290/290->290/290
> PNV: pass/total=362/362->362/362
> ILK: pass/total=381/381->379/381
> IVB: pass/total=522/559->522/559
> SNB: pass/total=444/444->444/444
> HSW: pass/total=595/595->595/595
> BDW: pass/total=436/436->436/436
> -------------------------------------Detailed-------------------------------------
> test_platform: test_suite, test_case, result_with_drm_intel_nightly(count, machine_id...)...->result_with_patch_applied(count, machine_id)...
> ILK: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_flip_flip-vs-wf_vblank-interruptible, DMESG_WARN(2, M26)PASS(2, M37M26) -> DMESG_WARN(1, M26)PASS(3, M26)
> ILK: Intel_gpu_tools, igt_kms_flip_single-buffer-flip-vs-dpms-off-vs-modeset, DMESG_WARN(1, M26)PASS(3, M37M26) -> DMESG_WARN(1, M26)PASS(3, M26)

Looks like these two tests are flakey; this patch shouldn't affect
those cases.  Do we have bugs open for these subtests already?

Thanks,
-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center