[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Disable the mmio.debug WARN after it fires
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Nov 24 12:07:01 CET 2014
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:52:23PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > If we have a single unclaimed register, we will have lots. A WARN for
> > each one makes the machine unusable and does not aid debugging. Convert
> > the i915.mmio_debug option to a counter for how many WARNs to fire
> > before shutting up. Even when i915.mmio_debug was disabled it would
> > continue to shout an *ERROR* for every interrupt, without any
> > information at all for debugging.
> >
> > The massive verbiage was added in
> > commit 5978118c39c2f72fd8b39ef9c086723542384809
> > Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> > Date: Wed Jul 16 17:49:29 2014 -0300
> >
> > drm/i915: reorganize the unclaimed register detection code
> >
> > v2: Automatically enable invalid mmio reporting for the *next* invalid
> > access if mmio_debug is disabled by default. This should give us clearer
> > debug information without polluting the logs too much.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com>
> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 6 +++---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 10 ++++++++--
> > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index 5448ce9d1490..314d8a60d55b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -2310,7 +2310,7 @@ struct i915_params {
> > bool disable_display;
> > bool disable_vtd_wa;
> > int use_mmio_flip;
> > - bool mmio_debug;
> > + int mmio_debug;
> > };
> > extern struct i915_params i915 __read_mostly;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > index c91cb2033cc5..9de6e8265a14 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> > @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ module_param_named(use_mmio_flip, i915.use_mmio_flip, int, 0600);
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(use_mmio_flip,
> > "use MMIO flips (-1=never, 0=driver discretion [default], 1=always)");
> >
> > -module_param_named(mmio_debug, i915.mmio_debug, bool, 0600);
> > +module_param_named(mmio_debug, i915.mmio_debug, int, 0600);
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(mmio_debug,
> > - "Enable the MMIO debug code (default: false). This may negatively "
> > - "affect performance.");
> > + "Enable the MMIO debug code (default: off). "
> > + "This may negatively affect performance.");
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > index f0230b0e8e11..01ae5aec9e02 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > @@ -721,18 +721,24 @@ hsw_unclaimed_reg_debug(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, bool read,
> > WARN(1, "Unclaimed register detected %s %s register 0x%x\n",
> > when, op, reg);
> > __raw_i915_write32(dev_priv, FPGA_DBG, FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM);
> > + i915.mmio_debug--; /* Only report the first N failures */
> > }
> > }
> >
> > static void
> > hsw_unclaimed_reg_detect(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > {
> > - if (i915.mmio_debug)
> > + static bool mmio_debug_once = true;
> > +
> > + if (i915.mmio_debug || !i915.mmio_debug_once)
> > return;
> >
> > if (__raw_i915_read32(dev_priv, FPGA_DBG) & FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM) {
> > - DRM_ERROR("Unclaimed register detected. Please use the i915.mmio_debug=1 to debug this problem.");
> > + DRM_DEBUG("Unclaimed register detected, "
> > + "enabling oneshot unclaimed register reporting. "
> > + "Please use the i915.mmio_debug=N for more information.\n");
> > __raw_i915_write32(dev_priv, FPGA_DBG, FPGA_DBG_RM_NOCLAIM);
> > + i915.mmio_debug = i915.mmio_debug_once--;
>
> I suspect you have uncommitted changes in your work tree.
Or that I only use this tree to write gedankenexperiment against -nightly...
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list