[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] Kill IS_ULT() in favour of the per-product variant

[Damien Lespiau]

A few reasons why I'd like to do that:

  - IS_ULT() started as a HSW-only macro but has grown to mean IS_BDW_ULT/ULX
    as well. That means a few usages of IS_ULT() were slightly out of place
    (because we really meant checking for IS_HSW_ULT()).

  - Being a ULT/ULX package doesn't mean anything specific in term of
    functionnality when looking across HSW/BDW/SKL, it's more about the TDP of
    that SKU. So it doesn't make a lot of sense to continue growing IS_ULT() to
    encompass SKL.

  - The SPT detection code was using IS_ULT() for consistency with HSW and
    then, because the current IS_ULT() macro didn't know about SKL, we were
    triggering a warning. We now know that the pairing is a 1:1 relationship
    between the ULT/ULX SKUs and the LP PCHs, so we don't strickly need this
    check there and there's nothing needing a ULT/ULX check on SKL at the
    moment, so just discarded it in the PCH detection code.

-- 
Damien

Damien Lespiau (6):
  drm/i915: Use IS_HSW_ULT() in a HSW specific code path
  drm/i915: Use IS_HSW_ULT() in HAS_IPS()
  drm/i915: Spell out IS_HSW/BDW_ULT() in intel_crt_present()
  drm/i915: Use IS_HSW_ULT() in HSW CDCLK clock read-out
  drm/i915/skl: Don't check for ULT/ULX when detecting the PCH
  drm/i915: Remove IS_ULT()

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c      | 6 ++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h      | 3 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c     | 2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1