[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/6] Kill IS_ULT() in favour of the per-product variant
Paulo Zanoni
przanoni at gmail.com
Fri Oct 3 20:40:17 CEST 2014
2014-10-01 17:36 GMT-03:00 Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:04:12PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
>> A few reasons why I'd like to do that:
>>
>> - IS_ULT() started as a HSW-only macro but has grown to mean IS_BDW_ULT/ULX
>> as well. That means a few usages of IS_ULT() were slightly out of place
>> (because we really meant checking for IS_HSW_ULT()).
>>
>> - Being a ULT/ULX package doesn't mean anything specific in term of
>> functionnality when looking across HSW/BDW/SKL, it's more about the TDP of
>> that SKU. So it doesn't make a lot of sense to continue growing IS_ULT() to
>> encompass SKL.
>>
>> - The SPT detection code was using IS_ULT() for consistency with HSW and
>> then, because the current IS_ULT() macro didn't know about SKL, we were
>> triggering a warning. We now know that the pairing is a 1:1 relationship
>> between the ULT/ULX SKUs and the LP PCHs, so we don't strickly need this
>> check there and there's nothing needing a ULT/ULX check on SKL at the
>> moment, so just discarded it in the PCH detection code.
As far as I know (and as far as our WARNs inside intel_detect_pch()
have checked), the whole CPU/PCH pairing is a static thing. Can't we
try to kill the whole intel_detect_pch(), and change the HAS_PCH_FOO
macros to just check the PCI IDs or something like that?
>
> On the topic of ditching useless IS_FOO macros: For gen5+ the
> intel_info->is_mobile is similarly meaningless. Someone bored could make
> sure that we really don't have any pointless IS_MOBILE checks on those
> platforms and then garbage-collect all the intel_info structs.
> -Daniel
>
>>
>> --
>> Damien
>>
>> Damien Lespiau (6):
>> drm/i915: Use IS_HSW_ULT() in a HSW specific code path
>> drm/i915: Use IS_HSW_ULT() in HAS_IPS()
>> drm/i915: Spell out IS_HSW/BDW_ULT() in intel_crt_present()
>> drm/i915: Use IS_HSW_ULT() in HSW CDCLK clock read-out
>> drm/i915/skl: Don't check for ULT/ULX when detecting the PCH
>> drm/i915: Remove IS_ULT()
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 6 ++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
>> 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Paulo Zanoni
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list