[Intel-gfx] [RFC 20/21] drm/i915: Convert 'ring_idle()' to use requests not seqnos

John Harrison John.C.Harrison at Intel.com
Tue Oct 28 15:03:14 CET 2014


On 19/10/2014 15:09, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 03:15:24PM +0100, John.C.Harrison at Intel.com wrote:
>> From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison at Intel.com>
>>
>> For: VIZ-4377
>> Signed-off-by: John.C.Harrison at Intel.com
> We have places that shovel stuff onto the ring without an explicit
> add_request. Or at least we've had, so this needs a full audit, and that
> audit needs to be in the commit message.
> -Daniel
Not sure what you mean. There is no functional change here. The old 
version pulled the seqno out of the last request entry in the list and 
compared that to the hardware seqno value to check for completion. The 
new version gets the same request entry and does the same completion 
test, just in request parlance. If commands are being dumped on the ring 
without an request being added to the request list then the old version 
would still not have been checking for them. It would still only look at 
the last piece of work that actually did call add_request and see if 
that has completed or not.

>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c |   12 ++++++------
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> index 4847ed5..c2a7127 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> @@ -3030,18 +3030,18 @@ static void gen8_disable_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe)
>>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static u32
>> -ring_last_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>> +static struct drm_i915_gem_request *
>> +ring_last_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>>   {
>>   	return list_entry(ring->request_list.prev,
>> -			  struct drm_i915_gem_request, list)->seqno;
>> +			  struct drm_i915_gem_request, list);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static bool
>> -ring_idle(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, u32 seqno)
>> +ring_idle(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>>   {
>>   	return (list_empty(&ring->request_list) ||
>> -		i915_seqno_passed(seqno, ring_last_seqno(ring)));
>> +		i915_gem_request_completed(ring_last_request(ring), false));
>>   }
>>   
>>   static bool
>> @@ -3261,7 +3261,7 @@ static void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(unsigned long data)
>>   		acthd = intel_ring_get_active_head(ring);
>>   
>>   		if (ring->hangcheck.seqno == seqno) {
>> -			if (ring_idle(ring, seqno)) {
>> +			if (ring_idle(ring)) {
>>   				ring->hangcheck.action = HANGCHECK_IDLE;
>>   
>>   				if (waitqueue_active(&ring->irq_queue)) {
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list