[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] igt/gem_workarounds: rework igt to test workaround registers
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Tue Sep 2 13:04:34 CEST 2014
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:59:06AM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:18:20AM +0100, Arun Siluvery wrote:
> > - igt_assert(fd >= 0);
> > + if (fd < 0)
> > + igt_skip_on("No Workaround table available !!\n");
>
> That's not quite a correct use of the API. The _on is there to signal
> the first argument is an expression. This will work only because the
> string is evaluated to true. You probably want to use igt_skip_on_f()
>
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/igt/intel-gpu-tools-i-g-t-core.html#igt-skip-on-f
Or just igt_skip_on - we dump the expression that was tested, which should
be fairly informational. At least when fd would have a better name ;-)
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list