[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 51/89] drm/i915/gen9: Add 2us read latency to WM level
Damien Lespiau
damien.lespiau at intel.com
Thu Sep 4 13:27:17 CEST 2014
From: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan at intel.com>
According to the updated Bspec, The mailbox response data is not currently
accounting for memory read latency. Add 2 microseconds to the result for
each level.
This patch adds 2us to latency of level 0 for all cases and
for all other levels (1-7) only if latency[level] > 0.
v2: Slightly rework the patch and add a big comment (Damien)
Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan at intel.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: M, Satheeshakrishna <satheeshakrishna.m at intel.com> (v1)
Cc: Lespiau, Damien <damien.lespiau at intel.com>
Cc: M, Satheeshakrishna <satheeshakrishna.m at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 1e56067..16ad008 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2254,6 +2254,7 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_device *dev, uint16_t wm[8])
if (IS_GEN9(dev)) {
uint32_t val;
int ret;
+ int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev);
/* read the first set of memory latencies[0:3] */
val = 0; /* data0 to be programmed to 0 for first set */
@@ -2267,6 +2268,7 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_device *dev, uint16_t wm[8])
DRM_ERROR("SKL Mailbox read error = %d\n", ret);
return;
}
+
wm[0] = val & GEN9_MEM_LAT_LEVEL_MASK;
wm[1] = (val >> GEN9_MEM_LAT_LEVEL_1_5_SHIFT) &
GEN9_MEM_LAT_LEVEL_MASK;
@@ -2293,6 +2295,22 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_device *dev, uint16_t wm[8])
GEN9_MEM_LAT_LEVEL_MASK;
wm[7] = (val >> GEN9_MEM_LAT_LEVEL_3_7_SHIFT) &
GEN9_MEM_LAT_LEVEL_MASK;
+
+ /*
+ * punit doesn't take into account the read latency so we need
+ * to add 2us to the various latency levels we retrieve from
+ * the punit.
+ * - W0 is a bit special in that it's the only level that
+ * can't be disabled if we want to have display working, so
+ * we always add 2us there.
+ * - For levels >=1, punit returns 0us latency when they are
+ * disabled, so we respect that and don't add 2us then
+ */
+ wm[0] += 2;
+ for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++)
+ if (wm[level] != 0)
+ wm[level] += 2;
+
} else if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) {
uint64_t sskpd = I915_READ64(MCH_SSKPD);
--
1.8.3.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list