[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: HSW always use GGTT selector for secure batches
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Sep 10 13:18:27 CEST 2014
gen6 and earlier conflate address space selection (ppgtt vs ggtt) with
the security bit (i.e. only privileged batches were allowed to run from
ggtt). From Haswell onwards, you are able to select the security bit
separate from the address space - and we always requested to use ppgtt.
This breaks the golden render state batch execution with full-ppgtt as
that is only present in the global GTT and more generally any secure
batch that is not colocated in the ppgtt and ggtt. So we need to
disable the use of the ppgtt selector bit for secure batches, or else we
hang immediately upon boot and thence after every GPU reset...
v2: Only HSW differentiates between secure dispatch and ggtt, so simply
ignore the differentiation and always use secure==ggtt.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index 109de2eeb9a8..25795f2efdcb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -2203,8 +2203,9 @@ hsw_ring_dispatch_execbuffer(struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
return ret;
intel_ring_emit(ring,
- MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | MI_BATCH_PPGTT_HSW |
- (flags & I915_DISPATCH_SECURE ? 0 : MI_BATCH_NON_SECURE_HSW));
+ MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START |
+ (flags & I915_DISPATCH_SECURE ?
+ 0 : MI_BATCH_PPGTT_HSW | MI_BATCH_NON_SECURE_HSW));
/* bit0-7 is the length on GEN6+ */
intel_ring_emit(ring, offset);
intel_ring_advance(ring);
--
2.1.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list