[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Fix irq checks in ring->irq_get/put functions
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Sep 15 11:48:14 CEST 2014
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:41:19AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Yet another place that wasn't properly transformed when implementing
> SOix. While at it convert the checks to WARN_ON on gen5+ (since we
> don't have UMS potentially doing stupid things on those platforms).
> And also add the corresponding checks to the put functions (again with
> a WARN_ON) for gen5+.
>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
> Cc: "Volkin, Bradley D" <bradley.d.volkin at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 4 +++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index bafd38b5703e..5fb61d76fd60 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -1063,7 +1063,7 @@ static bool gen8_logical_ring_get_irq(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - if (!dev->irq_enabled)
> + if (WARN_ON(!intel_irqs_enabled(dev_priv)))
> return false;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->irq_lock, flags);
> @@ -1082,6 +1082,8 @@ static void gen8_logical_ring_put_irq(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + WARN_ON(!intel_irqs_enabled(dev_priv));
Please no. This would be a BUG().
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list