[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 80/89] drm/i915/skl: Augment the latency debugfs files for SKL

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Fri Sep 19 12:53:31 CEST 2014


On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:27:46PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 02cb310..1520d1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -3499,7 +3499,7 @@ static const struct file_operations i915_display_crc_ctl_fops = {
>  	.write = display_crc_ctl_write
>  };
>  
> -static void wm_latency_show(struct seq_file *m, const uint16_t wm[5])
> +static void wm_latency_show(struct seq_file *m, const uint16_t wm[8])
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = m->private;
>  	int num_levels = ilk_wm_max_level(dev) + 1;
> @@ -3510,13 +3510,17 @@ static void wm_latency_show(struct seq_file *m, const uint16_t wm[5])
>  	for (level = 0; level < num_levels; level++) {
>  		unsigned int latency = wm[level];
>  
> -		/* WM1+ latency values in 0.5us units */
> -		if (level > 0)
> +		/*
> +		 * - WM1+ latency values in 0.5us units
> +		 * - latencies are in us on gen9
> +		 */
> +		if (IS_GEN9(dev))

gen >= 9 here to perhaps?

Apart from that it looks ok to me.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

> +			latency *= 10;
> +		else if (level > 0)
>  			latency *= 5;
>  
>  		seq_printf(m, "WM%d %u (%u.%u usec)\n",
> -			   level, wm[level],
> -			   latency / 10, latency % 10);
> +			   level, wm[level], latency / 10, latency % 10);
>  	}
>  
>  	drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> @@ -3525,8 +3529,15 @@ static void wm_latency_show(struct seq_file *m, const uint16_t wm[5])
>  static int pri_wm_latency_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = m->private;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +	const uint16_t *latencies;
> +
> +	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9)
> +		latencies = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency;
> +	else
> +		latencies = to_i915(dev)->wm.pri_latency;
>  
> -	wm_latency_show(m, to_i915(dev)->wm.pri_latency);
> +	wm_latency_show(m, latencies);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -3534,8 +3545,15 @@ static int pri_wm_latency_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  static int spr_wm_latency_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = m->private;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +	const uint16_t *latencies;
> +
> +	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9)
> +		latencies = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency;
> +	else
> +		latencies = to_i915(dev)->wm.spr_latency;
>  
> -	wm_latency_show(m, to_i915(dev)->wm.spr_latency);
> +	wm_latency_show(m, latencies);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -3543,8 +3561,15 @@ static int spr_wm_latency_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  static int cur_wm_latency_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct drm_device *dev = m->private;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +	const uint16_t *latencies;
> +
> +	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9)
> +		latencies = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency;
> +	else
> +		latencies = to_i915(dev)->wm.cur_latency;
>  
> -	wm_latency_show(m, to_i915(dev)->wm.cur_latency);
> +	wm_latency_show(m, latencies);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -3580,11 +3605,11 @@ static int cur_wm_latency_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t wm_latency_write(struct file *file, const char __user *ubuf,
> -				size_t len, loff_t *offp, uint16_t wm[5])
> +				size_t len, loff_t *offp, uint16_t wm[8])
>  {
>  	struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
>  	struct drm_device *dev = m->private;
> -	uint16_t new[5] = { 0 };
> +	uint16_t new[8] = { 0 };
>  	int num_levels = ilk_wm_max_level(dev) + 1;
>  	int level;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -3598,7 +3623,9 @@ static ssize_t wm_latency_write(struct file *file, const char __user *ubuf,
>  
>  	tmp[len] = '\0';
>  
> -	ret = sscanf(tmp, "%hu %hu %hu %hu %hu", &new[0], &new[1], &new[2], &new[3], &new[4]);
> +	ret = sscanf(tmp, "%hu %hu %hu %hu %hu %hu %hu %hu",
> +		     &new[0], &new[1], &new[2], &new[3],
> +		     &new[4], &new[5], &new[6], &new[7]);
>  	if (ret != num_levels)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> @@ -3618,8 +3645,15 @@ static ssize_t pri_wm_latency_write(struct file *file, const char __user *ubuf,
>  {
>  	struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
>  	struct drm_device *dev = m->private;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +	uint16_t *latencies;
>  
> -	return wm_latency_write(file, ubuf, len, offp, to_i915(dev)->wm.pri_latency);
> +	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9)
> +		latencies = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency;
> +	else
> +		latencies = to_i915(dev)->wm.pri_latency;
> +
> +	return wm_latency_write(file, ubuf, len, offp, latencies);
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t spr_wm_latency_write(struct file *file, const char __user *ubuf,
> @@ -3627,8 +3661,15 @@ static ssize_t spr_wm_latency_write(struct file *file, const char __user *ubuf,
>  {
>  	struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
>  	struct drm_device *dev = m->private;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +	uint16_t *latencies;
>  
> -	return wm_latency_write(file, ubuf, len, offp, to_i915(dev)->wm.spr_latency);
> +	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9)
> +		latencies = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency;
> +	else
> +		latencies = to_i915(dev)->wm.spr_latency;
> +
> +	return wm_latency_write(file, ubuf, len, offp, latencies);
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t cur_wm_latency_write(struct file *file, const char __user *ubuf,
> @@ -3636,8 +3677,15 @@ static ssize_t cur_wm_latency_write(struct file *file, const char __user *ubuf,
>  {
>  	struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
>  	struct drm_device *dev = m->private;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> +	uint16_t *latencies;
> +
> +	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9)
> +		latencies = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency;
> +	else
> +		latencies = to_i915(dev)->wm.cur_latency;
>  
> -	return wm_latency_write(file, ubuf, len, offp, to_i915(dev)->wm.cur_latency);
> +	return wm_latency_write(file, ubuf, len, offp, latencies);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct file_operations i915_pri_wm_latency_fops = {
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list