[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 47/89] drm/i915/skl: SKL Watermark Computation

Damien Lespiau damien.lespiau at intel.com
Tue Sep 23 13:14:02 CEST 2014


On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 03:07:51PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:27:13PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > From: Pradeep Bhat <pradeep.bhat at intel.com>
> > 
> > This patch implements the watermark algorithm and its necessary
> > functions. Two function pointers skl_update_wm and
> > skl_update_sprite_wm are provided. The skl_update_wm will update
> > the watermarks for the crtc provided as an argument and then
> > checks for change in DDB allocation for other active pipes and
> > recomputes the watermarks for those Pipes and planes as well.
> > Finally it does the register programming for all dirty pipes.
> > The trigger of the Watermark double buffer registers will have
> > to be once the plane configurations are done by the caller.
> > 
> > v2: fixed the divide-by-0 error in the results computation func.
> >     Also reworked the PLANE_WM register values computation func to
> >     make it more compact. Incorporated all other review comments
> >     from Damien.
> > 
> > v3: Changed the skl_compute_plane_wm function to now return success
> >     or failure. Also the result blocks and lines are computed here
> >     instead of in skl_compute_wm_results function.
> > 
> > v4: Adjust skl_ddb_alloc_changed() to the new planes/cursor split
> >     (Damien)
> > 
> > v5: Reworked the affected functions to implement new plane/cursor
> >     split.
> > 
> > v6: Rework the logic that triggers the DDB allocation and WM computation
> >     of skl_update_other_pipe_wm() to not depend on non-computed DDB
> >     values.
> >     Always give a valid cursor_width (at boot it's 0) to keep the
> >     invariant that we consider the cursor plane always enabled.
> >     Otherwise we end up dividing by 0 in skl_compute_plane_wm()
> >     (Damien Lespiau)
> > 
> > v7: Spell out allocation
> >     skl_ddb_ functions should have the ddb as first argument
> >     Make the skl_ddb_alloc_changed() parameters const
> >     (Damien)
> > 
> > v8: Rebase on top of the crtc->primary changes
> > 
> > v9: Split the staging results structure to not exceed the 1Kb stack
> >     allocation in skl_update_wm()
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pradeep Bhat <pradeep.bhat at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>
> > 
> > drm/i915/skl: Don't allocate as much on the stack in skl_update_wm()
> > 
> > Stack space can be scarce and a compiler check has been added to warn if the
> > per-function stack allocation is above 1KB.
> > 
> > We we were hitting that warning in skl_update_wm(), so move the big
> > results array in dev_priv instead.
> > 
> > For reference, here's the compiler warning before this patch:
> > 
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: In function ‘skl_update_wm’:
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:3618:1: warning: the frame size of 1296 bytes
> >     is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com>

So, v11 is answering all the review comments below  but two, which I
think need a proper diff to develop and review comfortably, so I'll send
them on their own (and then we could them as separate patches or
squashed into this one). The two changes in question are:
 
  1/ put the (temporary) transition WM computation in the eponymous
     function instead of resolving it at compute_results time

  2/ Move the validity checks inside the compute function

-- 
Damien

> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  12 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 423 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 434 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index de278a5..9b0e398 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -1709,8 +1709,18 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
> >  		 */
> >  		uint16_t skl_latency[8];
> >  
> > +		/*
> > +		 * The skl_wm_values structure is a bit too big for stack
> > +		 * allocation, so we keep the staging struct where we store
> > +		 * intermediate results here instead.
> > +		 */
> > +		struct skl_wm_values skl_results;
> > +
> >  		/* current hardware state */
> > -		struct ilk_wm_values hw;
> > +		union {
> > +			struct ilk_wm_values hw;
> > +			struct skl_wm_values skl_hw;
> > +		};
> >  	} wm;
> >  
> >  	struct i915_runtime_pm pm;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 2503ab9..4ee90b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -2937,6 +2937,427 @@ static bool ilk_disable_lp_wm(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  	return _ilk_disable_lp_wm(dev_priv, WM_DIRTY_LP_ALL);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static uint32_t skl_pipe_pixel_rate(struct drm_device *dev,
> > +				    struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > +{
> > +	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > +	uint32_t pixel_rate;
> > +
> > +	pixel_rate = intel_crtc->config.adjusted_mode.crtc_clock;
> > +
> > +	return pixel_rate;
> > +}
> 
> I changed the ilk version to take just the pipe config as a parameter.
> This should be changed to do the same. I'm not entirely sure it makes
> sense to have this function around until pipe scaling is implemented,
> but I guess it serves as a decent reminder that something needs to be
> done here.
> 
> > +
> > +static uint32_t skl_wm_method1(uint32_t pixel_rate, uint8_t bytes_per_pixel,
> > +			       uint32_t latency)
> > +{
> > +	uint32_t wm_intermediate_val, ret;
> > +
> > +	if (latency == 0)
> > +		return UINT_MAX;
> > +
> > +	wm_intermediate_val = latency * pixel_rate * bytes_per_pixel;
> 
> I was a bit worried if we have enough bits here, but max latency should
> be 0xff and bytes_per_pixel should always be <=8, so that should allow
> pixel_rate up to ~2 GHz which seems sufficient since max 2xcdclk is
> 1350 MHz and the pixel rate should never exceed that. Not that we have
> such checks anywhere at the moment, but we should eventually add them.
> 
> > +	ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(wm_intermediate_val, 1000);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static uint32_t skl_wm_method2(uint32_t pixel_rate, uint32_t pipe_htotal,
> > +			       uint32_t horiz_pixels, uint8_t bytes_per_pixel,
> > +			       uint32_t latency)
> > +{
> > +	uint32_t ret, plane_bytes_per_line, wm_intermediate_val;
> > +
> > +	if (latency == 0)
> > +		return UINT_MAX;
> > +
> > +	plane_bytes_per_line = horiz_pixels * bytes_per_pixel;
> > +	wm_intermediate_val = latency * pixel_rate;
> > +	ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(wm_intermediate_val, pipe_htotal * 1000) *
> > +				plane_bytes_per_line;
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void skl_compute_transition_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > +				  struct skl_pipe_wm_parameters *params,
> > +				  struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm)
> > +{
> > +	/*
> > +	 * For now it is suggested to use the LP0 wm val of corresponding
> > +	 * plane as transition wm val. This is done while computing results.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!params->active)
> > +		return;
> > +}
> 
> Seems like a rather pointless function.
> 
> > +
> > +static uint32_t
> > +skl_compute_linetime_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct skl_pipe_wm_parameters *p)
> > +{
> > +	if (!intel_crtc_active(crtc))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	return DIV_ROUND_UP(8 * p->pipe_htotal * 1000, p->pixel_rate);
> > +
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool skl_ddb_allocation_changed(const struct skl_ddb_allocation *new_ddb,
> > +				       const struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_device *dev = intel_crtc->base.dev;
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > +	struct skl_ddb_allocation *cur_ddb = &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb;
> 
> const
> 
> > +	enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> > +	size_t size;
> > +
> > +	size = ARRAY_SIZE(new_ddb->plane[pipe]) * sizeof(struct skl_ddb_entry);
> 
> sizeof(new_ddb->plane[pipe])
> 
> > +	if (memcmp(new_ddb->plane[pipe], cur_ddb->plane[pipe], size))
> > +		return true;
> > +
> > +	if (memcmp(&new_ddb->cursor[pipe], &cur_ddb->cursor[pipe],
> > +		    sizeof(struct skl_ddb_entry)))
> 
> sizeof(new_ddb->cursor[pipe])
> 
> > +		return true;
> > +
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void skl_compute_wm_global_parameters(struct drm_device *dev,
> > +					     struct intel_wm_config *config)
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> > +	struct drm_plane *plane;
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry(crtc, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, head)
> > +		config->num_pipes_active += intel_crtc_active(crtc);
> > +
> > +	/* FIXME: I don't think we need those two global parameters on SKL */
> > +	list_for_each_entry(plane, &dev->mode_config.plane_list, head) {
> > +		struct intel_plane *intel_plane = to_intel_plane(plane);
> > +
> > +		config->sprites_enabled |= intel_plane->wm.enabled;
> > +		config->sprites_scaled |= intel_plane->wm.scaled;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void skl_compute_wm_pipe_parameters(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > +					   struct skl_pipe_wm_parameters *p)
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> > +	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > +	enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> > +	struct drm_plane *plane;
> > +	int i = 1; /* Index for sprite planes start */
> > +
> > +	p->active = intel_crtc_active(crtc);
> > +	if (p->active) {
> > +		p->pipe_htotal = intel_crtc->config.adjusted_mode.crtc_htotal;
> > +		p->pixel_rate = skl_pipe_pixel_rate(dev, crtc);
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * For now, assume primary and cursor planes are always enabled.
> > +		 */
> > +		p->plane[0].enabled = true;
> > +		p->plane[0].bytes_per_pixel =
> > +			crtc->primary->fb->bits_per_pixel / 8;
> > +		p->plane[0].horiz_pixels = intel_crtc->config.pipe_src_w;
> > +		p->plane[0].vert_pixels = intel_crtc->config.pipe_src_h;
> > +
> > +		p->cursor.enabled = true;
> > +		p->cursor.bytes_per_pixel = 4;
> > +		p->cursor.horiz_pixels = intel_crtc->cursor_width ?
> > +					 intel_crtc->cursor_width : 64;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry(plane, &dev->mode_config.plane_list, head) {
> > +		struct intel_plane *intel_plane = to_intel_plane(plane);
> > +
> > +		if (intel_plane->pipe == pipe)
> > +			p->plane[i++] = intel_plane->wm;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool skl_compute_plane_wm(struct skl_pipe_wm_parameters *p,
> > +				   struct intel_plane_wm_parameters *p_params,
> > +				   uint16_t max_page_buff_alloc,
> > +				   uint32_t mem_value,
> > +				   uint16_t *res_blocks, /* out */
> > +				   uint8_t *res_lines /* out */)
> > +{
> > +	uint32_t method1, method2, plane_bytes_per_line;
> > +	uint32_t result_bytes;
> > +
> > +	if (!p->active || !p_params->enabled) {
> > +		*res_blocks = PLANE_WM_BLOCKS_DEFAULT;
> > +		*res_lines = PLANE_WM_LINES_DEFAULT;
> 
> Why do we need to set !=0 values for disabled planes?
> 
> > +		return false;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	method1 = skl_wm_method1(p->pixel_rate,
> > +				 p_params->bytes_per_pixel,
> > +				 mem_value);
> > +	method2 = skl_wm_method2(p->pixel_rate,
> > +				 p->pipe_htotal,
> > +				 p_params->horiz_pixels,
> > +				 p_params->bytes_per_pixel,
> > +				 mem_value);
> > +
> > +	plane_bytes_per_line = p_params->horiz_pixels *
> > +					p_params->bytes_per_pixel;
> > +
> > +	/* For now xtile and linear */
> > +	if (((max_page_buff_alloc * 512) / plane_bytes_per_line) >= 1)
> > +		result_bytes = min(method1, method2);
> > +	else
> > +		result_bytes = method1;
> > +
> > +	*res_blocks = DIV_ROUND_UP(result_bytes, 512) + 1;
> > +	*res_lines = DIV_ROUND_UP(result_bytes, plane_bytes_per_line);
> > +
> 
> Seems we're missing the final validity checks here.
> 
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void skl_compute_wm_level(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +				 struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb,
> > +				 struct skl_pipe_wm_parameters *p,
> > +				 enum pipe pipe,
> > +				 int level,
> > +				 int num_planes,
> > +				 struct skl_wm_level *result)
> > +{
> > +	uint16_t latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level];
> > +	uint16_t ddb_blocks;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < num_planes; i++) {
> > +		ddb_blocks = skl_ddb_entry_size(&ddb->plane[pipe][i]);
> > +
> > +		result->plane_en[i] = skl_compute_plane_wm(p, &p->plane[i],
> > +						ddb_blocks,
> > +						latency,
> > +						&result->plane_res_b[i],
> > +						&result->plane_res_l[i]);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ddb_blocks = skl_ddb_entry_size(&ddb->cursor[pipe]);
> > +	result->cursor_en = skl_compute_plane_wm(p, &p->cursor, ddb_blocks,
> > +						 latency, &result->cursor_res_b,
> > +						 &result->cursor_res_l);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void skl_compute_pipe_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > +				struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb,
> > +				struct skl_pipe_wm_parameters *params,
> > +				struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm)
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> > +	const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > +	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > +	int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev);
> > +
> > +	for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> > +		skl_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, ddb, params, intel_crtc->pipe,
> > +				     level, intel_num_planes(intel_crtc),
> > +				     &pipe_wm->wm[level]);
> > +	}
> > +	pipe_wm->linetime = skl_compute_linetime_wm(crtc, params);
> > +
> > +	skl_compute_transition_wm(crtc, params, pipe_wm);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void skl_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
> > +				   struct skl_pipe_wm_parameters *p,
> > +				   struct skl_pipe_wm *p_wm,
> > +				   struct skl_wm_values *r,
> > +				   struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
> > +{
> > +	int i, level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev);
> > +	uint32_t temp;
> > +	enum pipe pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> > +	uint16_t ddb_blocks;
> 
> Could move a bunch of that to a narrower scope.
> 
> > +
> > +	for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> > +		for (i = 0; i < intel_num_planes(intel_crtc); i++) {
> > +			temp = 0;
> > +			ddb_blocks = skl_ddb_entry_size(&r->ddb.plane[pipe][i]);
> > +
> > +			if ((p_wm->wm[level].plane_res_b[i] > ddb_blocks) ||
> > +				(p_wm->wm[level].plane_res_l[i] > 31))
> > +				p_wm->wm[level].plane_en[i] = false;
> 
> So the validity check is here that I was expecting in skl_compute_plane_wm().
> The way this is done makes me think we might overflow the register
> bitfields if invalid values are propagated this far.
> 
> The way the ilk code works is that it won't ever keep around intermediate
> values that would exceed the register maximum values (such values are
> already dropped in intel_compute_pipe_wm()), and then it will filter out
> the otherwise invalid values in ilk_wm_merge() before ilk_compute_wm_results()
> gets called. Would seem less surprising if we could follow a similar
> pattern in the skl code.
> 
> > +
> > +			temp |= p_wm->wm[level].plane_res_l[i] <<
> > +					PLANE_WM_LINES_SHIFT;
> > +			temp |= p_wm->wm[level].plane_res_b[i];
> > +			if (p_wm->wm[level].plane_en[i])
> > +				temp |= PLANE_WM_EN;
> > +
> > +			r->plane[pipe][i][level] = temp;
> > +			/* Use the LP0 WM value for transition WM for now. */
> > +			if (level == 0)
> > +				r->plane_trans[pipe][i] = temp;
> 
> I'd stick this special case into the compute function rather than here.
> 
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		temp = 0;
> > +		ddb_blocks = skl_ddb_entry_size(&r->ddb.cursor[pipe]);
> > +
> > +		if ((p_wm->wm[level].cursor_res_b > ddb_blocks) ||
> > +			(p_wm->wm[level].cursor_res_l > 31))
> > +			p_wm->wm[level].cursor_en = false;
> > +
> > +		temp |= p_wm->wm[level].cursor_res_l << PLANE_WM_LINES_SHIFT;
> > +		temp |= p_wm->wm[level].cursor_res_b;
> > +
> > +		if (p_wm->wm[level].cursor_en)
> > +			temp |= PLANE_WM_EN;
> > +
> > +		r->cursor[pipe][level] = temp;
> > +		/* Use the LP0 WM value for transition WM for now. */
> > +		if (level == 0)
> > +			r->cursor_trans[pipe] = temp;
> > +
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	r->wm_linetime[pipe] = p_wm->linetime;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void skl_write_wm_values(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > +				struct skl_wm_values *new)
> 
> const
> 
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
> > +	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> > +	int i, level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev);
> > +	enum pipe pipe;
> 
> More stuff that could live in a narrower scope.
> 
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry(crtc, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, base.head) {
> > +		pipe = crtc->pipe;
> > +		if (new->dirty[pipe]) {
> > +			I915_WRITE(PIPE_WM_LINETIME(pipe),
> > +					new->wm_linetime[pipe]);
> > +
> > +			for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {
> > +				for (i = 0; i < intel_num_planes(crtc); i++)
> > +					I915_WRITE(PLANE_WM(pipe, i, level),
> > +						new->plane[pipe][i][level]);
> > +				I915_WRITE(CUR_WM(pipe, level),
> > +					new->cursor[pipe][level]);
> > +			}
> > +			for (i = 0; i < intel_num_planes(crtc); i++)
> > +				I915_WRITE(PLANE_WM_TRANS(pipe, i),
> > +						new->plane_trans[pipe][i]);
> > +			I915_WRITE(CUR_WM_TRANS(pipe), new->cursor_trans[pipe]);
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	dev_priv->wm.skl_hw = *new;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool skl_update_pipe_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > +			       struct skl_pipe_wm_parameters *params,
> > +			       struct intel_wm_config *config,
> > +			       struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb, /* out */
> > +			       struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm /* out */)
> > +{
> > +	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > +
> > +	skl_compute_wm_pipe_parameters(crtc, params);
> > +	skl_compute_pipe_wm(crtc, ddb, params, pipe_wm);
> > +
> > +	if (!memcmp(&intel_crtc->wm.skl_active, pipe_wm, sizeof(*pipe_wm)))
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	intel_crtc->wm.skl_active = *pipe_wm;
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void skl_update_other_pipe_wm(struct drm_device *dev,
> > +				     struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > +				     struct intel_wm_config *config,
> > +				     struct skl_wm_values *r)
> > +{
> > +	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
> > +	struct intel_crtc *this_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > +	struct skl_pipe_wm_parameters params;
> > +	struct skl_pipe_wm pipe_wm;
> 
> More stuff that can be moved to a narrower scope.
> 
> Should these be zero initializd? At least the way the ilk code works
> is that most structures need zero initialization to avoid consulting
> stack garbage somewhere down the line.
> 
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If the WM update hasn't changed the allocation for this_crtc (the
> > +	 * crtc we are currently computing the new WM values for), other
> > +	 * enabled crtcs will keep the same allocation and we don't need to
> > +	 * recompute anything for them.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (!skl_ddb_allocation_changed(&r->ddb, this_crtc))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Otherwise, because of this_crtc being freshly enabled/disabled, the
> > +	 * other active pipes need new DDB allocation and WM values.
> > +	 */
> > +	list_for_each_entry(intel_crtc, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list,
> > +				base.head) {
> 
> Not sure how the locking is planned here. In the ilk wm patches that are
> still pending I'm adding a wm.mutex which might fit the bill. Otherwise
> we're going to need to make sure we have all the crtc locks held here.
> 
> Also if multiple pipes are active we surely can't just go changing the
> DDB allocation without considering the fact that vblanks for all pipes
> don't occur at the same time. So some kind of heavy handed
> synchronization is needed to make sure none of the DDB allocations
> overlap even for a short period of time.
> 
> > +		bool wm_changed;
> > +
> > +		if (this_crtc->pipe == intel_crtc->pipe)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		if (!intel_crtc->active)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		wm_changed = skl_update_pipe_wm(&intel_crtc->base,
> > +						&params, config,
> > +						&r->ddb, &pipe_wm);
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * If we end up re-computing the other pipe WM values, it's
> > +		 * because it was really needed, so we expect the WM values to
> > +		 * be different.
> > +		 */
> > +		WARN_ON(!wm_changed);
> > +
> > +		skl_compute_wm_results(dev, &params, &pipe_wm, r, intel_crtc);
> > +		r->dirty[intel_crtc->pipe] = true;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void skl_update_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > +{
> > +	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > +	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > +	struct skl_pipe_wm_parameters params = {};
> > +	struct skl_wm_values *results = &dev_priv->wm.skl_results;
> > +	struct skl_pipe_wm pipe_wm = {};
> > +	struct intel_wm_config config = {};
> > +
> > +	memset(results, 0, sizeof(*results));
> > +
> > +	skl_compute_wm_global_parameters(dev, &config);
> > +
> > +	if (!skl_update_pipe_wm(crtc, &params, &config,
> > +				&results->ddb, &pipe_wm))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	skl_compute_wm_results(dev, &params, &pipe_wm, results, intel_crtc);
> > +	results->dirty[intel_crtc->pipe] = true;
> > +
> > +	skl_update_other_pipe_wm(dev, crtc, &config, results);
> > +	skl_write_wm_values(dev_priv, results);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +skl_update_sprite_wm(struct drm_plane *plane, struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > +		     uint32_t sprite_width, uint32_t sprite_height,
> > +		     int pixel_size, bool enabled, bool scaled)
> > +{
> > +	struct intel_plane *intel_plane = to_intel_plane(plane);
> > +
> > +	intel_plane->wm.enabled = enabled;
> > +	intel_plane->wm.scaled = scaled;
> > +	intel_plane->wm.horiz_pixels = sprite_width;
> > +	intel_plane->wm.vert_pixels = sprite_height;
> > +	intel_plane->wm.bytes_per_pixel = pixel_size;
> > +
> > +	skl_update_wm(crtc);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void ilk_update_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> >  {
> >  	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> > @@ -7464,6 +7885,8 @@ void intel_init_pm(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  		skl_setup_wm_latency(dev);
> >  
> >  		dev_priv->display.init_clock_gating = gen9_init_clock_gating;
> > +		dev_priv->display.update_wm = skl_update_wm;
> > +		dev_priv->display.update_sprite_wm = skl_update_sprite_wm;
> >  	} else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
> >  		ilk_setup_wm_latency(dev);
> >  
> > -- 
> > 1.8.3.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list