[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Allow userptr backchannel for passing aroung GTT mappings

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Apr 2 09:11:58 PDT 2015


Hi,

Typo in subject, then below.

On 04/02/2015 04:04 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Once userptr becomes part of client API, it is almost a certainly that
> eventually someone will try to create a new object from a mapping of
> another client object, e.g.
>
> new = vaImport(vaMap(old, &size), size);
>
> (using a hypothethical API, not meaning to pick on anyone!)
>
> Since this is actually fairly safe to implement and to allow (since it
> is within a single process space and the memory access passes the
> standard permissions test) let us not limit the Client possibilities.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Gwenole Beauchesne <gwenole.beauchesne at intel.com>
> Cc: MichaƂ Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> index d96276caab49..8031ebe424fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c
> @@ -750,6 +750,35 @@ static const struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops i915_gem_userptr_ops = {
>   	.release = i915_gem_userptr_release,
>   };
>
> +static struct drm_i915_gem_object *
> +find_object_from_vma(struct drm_device *dev,
> +		     struct drm_i915_gem_userptr *args)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = NULL;
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +
> +	down_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
> +	vma = find_vma(current->mm, args->user_ptr);
> +	if (vma == NULL)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	if (vma->vm_ops != dev->driver->gem_vm_ops)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	if (vma->vm_start != args->user_ptr ||
> +	    vma->vm_end != args->user_ptr + args->user_size) {
> +		obj = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	obj = to_intel_bo(vma->vm_private_data);
> +	drm_gem_object_reference(obj);

Hm, can't this race with last unreference in general, and with cleanup 
worker with userptr objects?

> +
> +out:
> +	up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
> +	return obj;
> +}
> +
>   /**
>    * Creates a new mm object that wraps some normal memory from the process
>    * context - user memory.
> @@ -757,8 +786,11 @@ static const struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops i915_gem_userptr_ops = {
>    * We impose several restrictions upon the memory being mapped
>    * into the GPU.
>    * 1. It must be page aligned (both start/end addresses, i.e ptr and size).
> - * 2. It must be normal system memory, not a pointer into another map of IO
> - *    space (e.g. it must not be a GTT mmapping of another object).
> + * 2. It must either be:
> + *    a) normal system memory, not a pointer into another map of IO
> + *       space (e.g. it must not be part of a GTT mmapping of another object).
> + *    b) a pointer to the complete GTT mmap of another object in your
> + *       address space.
>    * 3. We only allow a bo as large as we could in theory map into the GTT,
>    *    that is we limit the size to the total size of the GTT.
>    * 4. The bo is marked as being snoopable. The backing pages are left
> @@ -812,6 +844,14 @@ i915_gem_userptr_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   	}
>
> +	obj = find_object_from_vma(dev, args);
> +	if (obj) {
> +		if (IS_ERR(obj))
> +			return PTR_ERR(obj);
> +		else
> +			goto out;
> +	}
> +
>   	obj = i915_gem_object_alloc(dev);
>   	if (obj == NULL)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -833,7 +873,7 @@ i915_gem_userptr_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file
>   	if (ret == 0)
>   		ret = i915_gem_userptr_init__mmu_notifier(obj, args->flags);
>   	if (ret == 0)
> -		ret = drm_gem_handle_create(file, &obj->base, &handle);
> +out:		 ret = drm_gem_handle_create(file, &obj->base, &handle);
>
>   	/* drop reference from allocate - handle holds it now */
>   	drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(&obj->base);

Thing I don't like is how the user of this has no idea what kind of 
object it "imported". Maybe it doesn't matter, hm. Need to think about 
it more.

Regards,

Tvrtko


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list