[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915: Drop i915_gem_obj_is_pinned() from set-cache-level
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Wed Apr 29 07:50:13 PDT 2015
On 04/27/2015 01:41 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Since the remove of the pin-ioctl, we only care about not changing the
> cache level on buffers pinned to the hardware as indicated by
> obj->pin_display. So we can safely replace i915_gem_object_is_pinned()
> here with a plain obj->pin_display check. During rebinding, we will check
> sanity checks in case vma->pin_count is erroneously set.
>
> At the same time, we can micro-optimise GTT mmap() behaviour since we
> only need to relinquish the mmaps before Sandybridge.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index f0a6d03e9ba5..afdb604e4005 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -3768,31 +3768,34 @@ int i915_gem_object_set_cache_level(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> {
> struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
> struct i915_vma *vma, *next;
> + bool bound = false;
> int ret;
>
> if (obj->cache_level == cache_level)
> return 0;
>
> - if (i915_gem_obj_is_pinned(obj)) {
> + if (obj->pin_display) {
> DRM_DEBUG("can not change the cache level of pinned objects\n");
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, next, &obj->vma_list, vma_link) {
> + if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node))
> + continue;
> +
Another micro-optimisation?
Side note - this was puzzling and then I realized
i915_gem_valid_gtt_space says true when node is not allocated. It seems
to be only concerned by node colouring - so is that one badly name
function or I am missing something?
> if (!i915_gem_valid_gtt_space(vma, cache_level)) {
> ret = i915_vma_unbind(vma);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> - }
> + } else
> + bound = true;
> }
>
> - if (i915_gem_obj_bound_any(obj)) {
> + if (bound) {
> ret = i915_gem_object_finish_gpu(obj);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - i915_gem_object_finish_gtt(obj);
> -
> /* Before SandyBridge, you could not use tiling or fence
> * registers with snooped memory, so relinquish any fences
> * currently pointing to our region in the aperture.
> @@ -3801,15 +3804,21 @@ int i915_gem_object_set_cache_level(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> ret = i915_gem_object_put_fence(obj);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> +
> + i915_gem_release_mmap(obj);
> }
If only < gen6 we need to drop the mmap, what happens with the domain
tracking - who removes the GTT bit from there now?
>
> - list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link)
> - if (drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node)) {
> - ret = i915_vma_bind(vma, cache_level,
> - PIN_UPDATE);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> - }
> + list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link) {
> + if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (vma->pin_count)
> + return -EBUSY;
Preserve DRM_DEBUG as it was before?
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list