[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] Revert "tests/gem_ctx_param_basic: fix invalid params"
David Weinehall
david.weinehall at linux.intel.com
Fri Aug 7 05:53:57 PDT 2015
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 11:33:00PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> This reverts commit 0b45b0746f45deea11670a8b2c949776bbbef55c.
>
> The point of testing for LAST_FLAG + 1 is to catch abi extensions -
> despite our best efforts we really suck at properly reviewing for test
> coverage when extending ABI.
>
> The real bug here is that David Weinhall hasn't submitted updated igts
> for the NO_ZEROMAP feature yet. Imo the right course of action is to
> revert that feature if the testcase don't show up within a few days.
The reason I never submitted it was probably because of Chris's strong
opposition to the feature in the first place; I've had the testcase
laying around on my computer for quite a while.
Anyhow, here's a slightly modified version of that test -- hopefully
not breaking anything.
Signed-off-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall at linux.intel.com>
diff --git a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.h b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.h
index bc5d4bd827cf..f4deca6bd79e 100644
--- a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.h
+++ b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.h
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct local_i915_gem_context_param {
uint32_t size;
uint64_t param;
#define LOCAL_CONTEXT_PARAM_BAN_PERIOD 0x1
+#define LOCAL_CONTEXT_PARAM_NO_ZEROMAP 0x2
uint64_t value;
};
void gem_context_require_ban_period(int fd);
diff --git a/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c b/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c
index b44b37cf0538..1e7e8ff40703 100644
--- a/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c
+++ b/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ igt_main
ctx = gem_context_create(fd);
}
- ctx_param.param = LOCAL_CONTEXT_PARAM_BAN_PERIOD;
+ ctx_param.param = LOCAL_CONTEXT_PARAM_BAN_PERIOD;
igt_subtest("basic") {
ctx_param.context = ctx;
@@ -98,21 +98,31 @@ igt_main
ctx_param.size = 0;
}
- ctx_param.param = LOCAL_CONTEXT_PARAM_BAN_PERIOD + 1;
+ ctx_param.param = LOCAL_CONTEXT_PARAM_BAN_PERIOD;
- igt_subtest("invalid-param-get") {
- ctx_param.context = ctx;
- TEST_FAIL(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_GETPARAM, EINVAL);
+ igt_subtest("non-root-set") {
+ igt_fork(child, 1) {
+ igt_drop_root();
+
+ ctx_param.context = ctx;
+ TEST_SUCCESS(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_GETPARAM);
+ ctx_param.value--;
+ TEST_FAIL(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_SETPARAM, EPERM);
+ }
+
+ igt_waitchildren();
}
- igt_subtest("invalid-param-set") {
+ igt_subtest("root-set") {
ctx_param.context = ctx;
- TEST_FAIL(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_SETPARAM, EINVAL);
+ TEST_SUCCESS(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_GETPARAM);
+ ctx_param.value--;
+ TEST_SUCCESS(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_SETPARAM);
}
- ctx_param.param = LOCAL_CONTEXT_PARAM_BAN_PERIOD;
+ ctx_param.param = LOCAL_CONTEXT_PARAM_NO_ZEROMAP;
- igt_subtest("non-root-set") {
+ igt_subtest("non-root-set-no-zeromap") {
igt_fork(child, 1) {
igt_drop_root();
@@ -125,13 +135,32 @@ igt_main
igt_waitchildren();
}
- igt_subtest("root-set") {
+ igt_subtest("root-set-no-zeromap-enabled") {
ctx_param.context = ctx;
TEST_SUCCESS(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_GETPARAM);
- ctx_param.value--;
+ ctx_param.value = 1;
+ TEST_SUCCESS(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_SETPARAM);
+ }
+
+ igt_subtest("root-set-no-zeromap-disabled") {
+ ctx_param.context = ctx;
+ TEST_SUCCESS(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_GETPARAM);
+ ctx_param.value = 0;
TEST_SUCCESS(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_SETPARAM);
}
+ ctx_param.param = LOCAL_CONTEXT_PARAM_NO_ZEROMAP + 1;
+
+ igt_subtest("invalid-param-get") {
+ ctx_param.context = ctx;
+ TEST_FAIL(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_GETPARAM, EINVAL);
+ }
+
+ igt_subtest("invalid-param-set") {
+ ctx_param.context = ctx;
+ TEST_FAIL(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_SETPARAM, EINVAL);
+ }
+
igt_fixture
close(fd);
}
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list