[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] lib/core: Add optional reason for timeout failure
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Aug 12 05:47:33 PDT 2015
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 11:10:22AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On 08/07/2015 10:29 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > "Timed out" isn't a terribly informative message, allow users to set
> > something more informative. Inspired by a request from Jesse.
> >
> > Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> > ---
> > lib/igt_core.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > lib/igt_core.h | 3 ++-
> > lib/igt_debugfs.c | 4 ++--
> > lib/tests/igt_timeout.c | 2 +-
> > tests/kms_flip.c | 4 ++--
> > 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/igt_core.c b/lib/igt_core.c
> > index af3d87316857..e2c2502bd147 100644
> > --- a/lib/igt_core.c
> > +++ b/lib/igt_core.c
> > @@ -1748,9 +1748,13 @@ out:
> > free(line);
> > }
> >
> > +static const char *timeout_op;
> > static void igt_alarm_handler(int signal)
> > {
> > - igt_info("Timed out\n");
> > + if (timeout_op)
> > + igt_info("Timed out: %s\n", timeout_op);
> > + else
> > + igt_info("Timed out\n");
> >
> > /* exit with failure status */
> > igt_fail(IGT_EXIT_FAILURE);
> > @@ -1759,6 +1763,7 @@ static void igt_alarm_handler(int signal)
> > /**
> > * igt_set_timeout:
> > * @seconds: number of seconds before timeout
> > + * @op: Optional string to explain what operation has timed out in the debug log
> > *
> > * Fail a test and exit with #IGT_EXIT_FAILURE status after the specified
> > * number of seconds have elapsed. If the current test has subtests and the
> > @@ -1768,7 +1773,8 @@ static void igt_alarm_handler(int signal)
> > * Any previous timer is cancelled and no timeout is scheduled if @seconds is
> > * zero.
> > */
> > -void igt_set_timeout(unsigned int seconds)
> > +void igt_set_timeout(unsigned int seconds,
> > + const char *op)
> > {
> > struct sigaction sa;
> >
> > @@ -1776,6 +1782,8 @@ void igt_set_timeout(unsigned int seconds)
> > sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
> > sa.sa_flags = 0;
> >
> > + timeout_op = op;
> > +
> > if (seconds == 0)
> > sigaction(SIGALRM, NULL, NULL);
> > else
> > diff --git a/lib/igt_core.h b/lib/igt_core.h
> > index 83eac02b28bf..1a324ee85514 100644
> > --- a/lib/igt_core.h
> > +++ b/lib/igt_core.h
> > @@ -732,7 +732,8 @@ extern enum igt_log_level igt_log_level;
> > } while (0)
> >
> >
> > -void igt_set_timeout(unsigned int seconds);
> > +void igt_set_timeout(unsigned int seconds,
> > + const char *op);
> >
> > FILE *__igt_fopen_data(const char* igt_srcdir, const char* igt_datadir,
> > const char* filename);
> > diff --git a/lib/igt_debugfs.c b/lib/igt_debugfs.c
> > index 568154ac0e80..6180a2aa56db 100644
> > --- a/lib/igt_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/lib/igt_debugfs.c
> > @@ -463,9 +463,9 @@ static bool read_one_crc(igt_pipe_crc_t *pipe_crc, igt_crc_t *out)
> > ssize_t bytes_read;
> > char buf[pipe_crc->buffer_len];
> >
> > - igt_set_timeout(5);
> > + igt_set_timeout(5, "CRC reading");
> > bytes_read = read(pipe_crc->crc_fd, &buf, pipe_crc->line_len);
> > - igt_set_timeout(0);
> > + igt_set_timeout(0, NULL);
> >
> > igt_assert_eq(bytes_read, pipe_crc->line_len);
> > buf[bytes_read] = '\0';
> > diff --git a/lib/tests/igt_timeout.c b/lib/tests/igt_timeout.c
> > index 8affa61f3d79..d228041d493b 100644
> > --- a/lib/tests/igt_timeout.c
> > +++ b/lib/tests/igt_timeout.c
> > @@ -3,6 +3,6 @@
> >
> > igt_simple_main
> > {
> > - igt_set_timeout(1);
> > + igt_set_timeout(1, "Testcase");
> > sleep(5);
> > }
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c
> > index 25c924305c32..214cd696fd2f 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_flip.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_flip.c
> > @@ -1614,9 +1614,9 @@ static void test_nonblocking_read(int in)
> > }
> > igt_require(ret != -1);
> >
> > - igt_set_timeout(5);
> > + igt_set_timeout(5, "Nonblocking DRM fd reading");
> > ret = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
> > - igt_set_timeout(0);
> > + igt_set_timeout(0, NULL);
> > igt_assert_eq(ret, -1);
> > igt_assert_eq(errno, EAGAIN);
> >
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
Thanks for the review, pushed this patch + the other two + David's patch
to test NO_ZEROMAP to fix the gem_ctx_param_basic regression.
-Daniel
>
> The earlier version worked like a charm.
>
> Thanks,
> Jesse
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list