[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 4/3] tests/gem_ctx_param_basic: Expand ctx_param tests

[Jesse Barnes]

On 08/10/2015 07:15 AM, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 02:33:31PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> On 08/06/2015 02:30 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 09:52:52AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:53:17PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:32:10PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>>> A simple functional test here which does:
>>>>>> a) an execbuf with just 1 batch. With full ppgtt you should get that one
>>>>>> at offset 0. If not, skip the testcase.
>>>>>> b) set the NO_ZEROMAP property.
>>>>>> c) re-run the same batch, assert that now the buffer is relocated to
>>>>>> something non-0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just to make sure we have a bare minimal testcase to make sure we don't
>>>>>> break this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe this should be added to another test rather than here?  This test
>>>>> is described as a:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Basic test for context set/get param input validation."
>>>>>
>>>>> Somehow I feel that testing whether the *functionality* is correct
>>>>> does not belong in this test, but rather in some test case that's
>>>>> already related to execbufs, or even a dedicated test case.
>>>>>
>>>>> But that might be over-engineering.  Opinions?
>>>>
>>>> Yeah separate testcase would fit better, agreed.
>>>
>>> Update version of this patch is still missing. I'll need to revert the
>>> kernel side if this one doesn't show up soonish.
>>>
>>> Also you're breaking the invalid-flags testcase (did you bother to run
>>> them all and check for regressions?) which Jesse spotted, and with the new
>>> basic set this will be a P1 "I'm going to block everything" bug.
>>
>> We really need man pages for new ioctls as well in libdrm.
> 
> Hmmm, this isn't a new ioctl, just a context parameter that can be
> set/queried using a pre-existing ioctl, but I can modify the existing
> manual page (if there is one?) to include information about the new
> parameter.

Yeah we don't have one for this ioctl unfortunately.  There are examples of other ioctl man pages in the libdrm repo though; you could copy one of those and do one for the context get/set ioctl.  If you don't have any time, can you just file a JIRA instead?  We'll get to it eventually... :)

Thanks,
Jesse