[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/18] tests/gem_tiled_pread/pwrite: mark normal tests as basic
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Fri Aug 14 05:41:22 PDT 2015
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 01:31:34PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> These simple tests should always pass.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
Imo shouldn't be part of the basic set, they thrash the machine quite
badly. Especially gem_tiled_pread_pwrite thrashes all of memory, so nack
on that one from me. At least until we've implemented the speedup with
memlock that's been in JIRA since years ...
For gem_tiled_pread, why not just rename to gem_tiled_pread_basic?
-Daniel
> ---
> tests/gem_tiled_pread.c | 167 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> tests/gem_tiled_pread_pwrite.c | 48 ++++++------
> 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/gem_tiled_pread.c b/tests/gem_tiled_pread.c
> index fdc5173..92bb649 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_tiled_pread.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_tiled_pread.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ calculate_expected(int offset)
> return (base_y + tile_y) * WIDTH + base_x + tile_x;
> }
>
> -igt_simple_main
> +igt_main
> {
> int fd;
> int i, iter = 100;
> @@ -120,96 +120,101 @@ igt_simple_main
> uint32_t handle;
> uint32_t devid;
>
> - fd = drm_open_any();
> + igt_fixture {
> + fd = drm_open_any();
>
> - handle = create_bo(fd);
> - gem_get_tiling(fd, handle, &tiling, &swizzle);
> + handle = create_bo(fd);
> + gem_get_tiling(fd, handle, &tiling, &swizzle);
>
> - devid = intel_get_drm_devid(fd);
> -
> - if (IS_GEN2(devid)) {
> - tile_height = 16;
> - tile_width = 128;
> - tile_size = 2048;
> - } else {
> - tile_height = 8;
> - tile_width = 512;
> - tile_size = PAGE_SIZE;
> + devid = intel_get_drm_devid(fd);
> }
>
> - /* Read a bunch of random subsets of the data and check that they come
> - * out right.
> - */
> - for (i = 0; i < iter; i++) {
> - int size = WIDTH * HEIGHT * 4;
> - int offset = (random() % size) & ~3;
> - int len = (random() % size) & ~3;
> - int j;
> + igt_subtest("basic") {
>
> - if (len == 0)
> - len = 4;
> + if (IS_GEN2(devid)) {
> + tile_height = 16;
> + tile_width = 128;
> + tile_size = 2048;
> + } else {
> + tile_height = 8;
> + tile_width = 512;
> + tile_size = PAGE_SIZE;
> + }
>
> - if (offset + len > size)
> - len = size - offset;
> + /* Read a bunch of random subsets of the data and check that they come
> + * out right.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < iter; i++) {
> + int size = WIDTH * HEIGHT * 4;
> + int offset = (random() % size) & ~3;
> + int len = (random() % size) & ~3;
> + int j;
>
> - if (i == 0) {
> - offset = 0;
> - len = size;
> - }
> + if (len == 0)
> + len = 4;
>
> - gem_read(fd, handle, offset, linear, len);
> + if (offset + len > size)
> + len = size - offset;
>
> - /* Translate from offsets in the read buffer to the swizzled
> - * address that it corresponds to. This is the opposite of
> - * what Mesa does (calculate offset to be read given the linear
> - * offset it's looking for).
> - */
> - for (j = offset; j < offset + len; j += 4) {
> - uint32_t expected_val, found_val;
> - int swizzled_offset;
> - const char *swizzle_str;
> -
> - switch (swizzle) {
> - case I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_NONE:
> - swizzled_offset = j;
> - swizzle_str = "none";
> - break;
> - case I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9:
> - swizzled_offset = j ^
> - swizzle_bit(9, j);
> - swizzle_str = "bit9";
> - break;
> - case I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_10:
> - swizzled_offset = j ^
> - swizzle_bit(9, j) ^
> - swizzle_bit(10, j);
> - swizzle_str = "bit9^10";
> - break;
> - case I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_11:
> - swizzled_offset = j ^
> - swizzle_bit(9, j) ^
> - swizzle_bit(11, j);
> - swizzle_str = "bit9^11";
> - break;
> - case I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_10_11:
> - swizzled_offset = j ^
> - swizzle_bit(9, j) ^
> - swizzle_bit(10, j) ^
> - swizzle_bit(11, j);
> - swizzle_str = "bit9^10^11";
> - break;
> - default:
> - igt_assert_f(0, "Bad swizzle bits; %d\n",
> - swizzle);
> + if (i == 0) {
> + offset = 0;
> + len = size;
> + }
> +
> + gem_read(fd, handle, offset, linear, len);
> +
> + /* Translate from offsets in the read buffer to the swizzled
> + * address that it corresponds to. This is the opposite of
> + * what Mesa does (calculate offset to be read given the linear
> + * offset it's looking for).
> + */
> + for (j = offset; j < offset + len; j += 4) {
> + uint32_t expected_val, found_val;
> + int swizzled_offset;
> + const char *swizzle_str;
> +
> + switch (swizzle) {
> + case I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_NONE:
> + swizzled_offset = j;
> + swizzle_str = "none";
> + break;
> + case I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9:
> + swizzled_offset = j ^
> + swizzle_bit(9, j);
> + swizzle_str = "bit9";
> + break;
> + case I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_10:
> + swizzled_offset = j ^
> + swizzle_bit(9, j) ^
> + swizzle_bit(10, j);
> + swizzle_str = "bit9^10";
> + break;
> + case I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_11:
> + swizzled_offset = j ^
> + swizzle_bit(9, j) ^
> + swizzle_bit(11, j);
> + swizzle_str = "bit9^11";
> + break;
> + case I915_BIT_6_SWIZZLE_9_10_11:
> + swizzled_offset = j ^
> + swizzle_bit(9, j) ^
> + swizzle_bit(10, j) ^
> + swizzle_bit(11, j);
> + swizzle_str = "bit9^10^11";
> + break;
> + default:
> + igt_assert_f(0, "Bad swizzle bits; %d\n",
> + swizzle);
> + }
> + expected_val = calculate_expected(swizzled_offset);
> + found_val = linear[(j - offset) / 4];
> + igt_assert_f(expected_val == found_val,
> + "Bad read [%d]: %d instead of %d at 0x%08x "
> + "for read from 0x%08x to 0x%08x, swizzle=%s\n",
> + i, found_val, expected_val, j,
> + offset, offset + len,
> + swizzle_str);
> }
> - expected_val = calculate_expected(swizzled_offset);
> - found_val = linear[(j - offset) / 4];
> - igt_assert_f(expected_val == found_val,
> - "Bad read [%d]: %d instead of %d at 0x%08x "
> - "for read from 0x%08x to 0x%08x, swizzle=%s\n",
> - i, found_val, expected_val, j,
> - offset, offset + len,
> - swizzle_str);
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/tests/gem_tiled_pread_pwrite.c b/tests/gem_tiled_pread_pwrite.c
> index 3d8fdc9..efb56d5 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_tiled_pread_pwrite.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_tiled_pread_pwrite.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ create_bo(int fd)
> return handle;
> }
>
> -igt_simple_main
> +igt_main
> {
> int fd;
> uint32_t *data;
> @@ -109,34 +109,38 @@ igt_simple_main
> uint32_t tiling, swizzle;
> uint32_t handle, handle_target;
> int count;
> -
> - fd = drm_open_any();
> - count = SLOW_QUICK(intel_get_total_ram_mb() * 9 / 10, 8) ;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < count/2; i++) {
> - current_tiling_mode = I915_TILING_X;
> + igt_fixture {
> + fd = drm_open_any();
> + count = SLOW_QUICK(intel_get_total_ram_mb() * 9 / 10, 8);
> + }
> +
> + igt_subtest("basic") {
> + for (i = 0; i < count/2; i++) {
> + current_tiling_mode = I915_TILING_X;
>
> - handle = create_bo_and_fill(fd);
> - gem_get_tiling(fd, handle, &tiling, &swizzle);
> + handle = create_bo_and_fill(fd);
> + gem_get_tiling(fd, handle, &tiling, &swizzle);
>
> - gem_read(fd, handle, 0, linear, sizeof(linear));
> + gem_read(fd, handle, 0, linear, sizeof(linear));
>
> - handle_target = create_bo(fd);
> - gem_write(fd, handle_target, 0, linear, sizeof(linear));
> + handle_target = create_bo(fd);
> + gem_write(fd, handle_target, 0, linear, sizeof(linear));
>
> - /* Check the target bo's contents. */
> - data = gem_mmap(fd, handle_target, sizeof(linear), PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
> - for (j = 0; j < WIDTH*HEIGHT; j++)
> - igt_assert_f(data[j] == j,
> - "mismatch at %i: %i\n",
> - j, data[j]);
> - munmap(data, sizeof(linear));
> + /* Check the target bo's contents. */
> + data = gem_mmap(fd, handle_target, sizeof(linear), PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE);
> + for (j = 0; j < WIDTH*HEIGHT; j++)
> + igt_assert_f(data[j] == j,
> + "mismatch at %i: %i\n",
> + j, data[j]);
> + munmap(data, sizeof(linear));
>
> - /* Leak both bos so that we use all of system mem! */
> - gem_madvise(fd, handle_target, I915_MADV_DONTNEED);
> - gem_madvise(fd, handle, I915_MADV_DONTNEED);
> + /* Leak both bos so that we use all of system mem! */
> + gem_madvise(fd, handle_target, I915_MADV_DONTNEED);
> + gem_madvise(fd, handle, I915_MADV_DONTNEED);
>
> - igt_progress("gem_tiled_pread_pwrite: ", i, count/2);
> + igt_progress("gem_tiled_pread_pwrite: ", i, count/2);
> + }
> }
>
> close(fd);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list