[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: Force CL2 off in CHV x1 PHY

[Deepak]

On 07/09/2015 02:15 AM, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> We can choose to leave the display PHY CL2 powerdown up to some hardware
> signals, or we can force it. The BXT code forces the nonexistent CL2 in
> the x1 PHY to power down. Follow suit on CHV. Maybe it can still save
> some extra power by disabling some extra logic in CL1, or something.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h         | 1 +
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 9 +++++++++
>   2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 8010200..395f556 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -1139,6 +1139,7 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
>   #define   DPIO_SUS_CLK_CONFIG_GATE_CLKREQ	(3 << 0)
>   
>   #define CHV_CMN_DW30			0x8178
> +#define   DPIO_CL2_LDOFUSE_PWRENB	(1 << 6)
>   #define   DPIO_LRC_BYPASS		(1 << 3)
>   
>   #define _TXLANE(ch, lane, offset) ((ch ? 0x2400 : 0) + \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 37e4375..002b78f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -980,6 +980,15 @@ static void chv_dpio_cmn_power_well_enable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>   		tmp = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, _CHV_CMN_DW6_CH1);
>   		tmp |= DPIO_DYNPWRDOWNEN_CH1;
>   		vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, _CHV_CMN_DW6_CH1, tmp);
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * Force the non-existing CL2 off. BXT does this
> +		 * too, so maybe it saves some power even though
> +		 * CL2 doesn't exist?
> +		 */
> +		tmp = vlv_dpio_read(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_CMN_DW30);
> +		tmp |= DPIO_CL2_LDOFUSE_PWRENB;
> +		vlv_dpio_write(dev_priv, pipe, CHV_CMN_DW30, tmp);
>   	}
>   
Do we need to turn off CL2 each time we enable dpio cmn power wells?

btw, changes looks fine
Reviewed-by: Deepak S <deepak.s at linux.intel.com>


>   	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->sb_lock);