[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Also call frontbuffer flip when disabling planes.

Paulo Zanoni przanoni at gmail.com
Fri Aug 21 14:46:24 PDT 2015


2015-07-24 20:38 GMT-03:00 Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>:
> We also need to call the frontbuffer flip to trigger proper
> invalidations when disabling planes. Otherwise we will miss
> screen updates when disabling sprites or cursor.
>
> It was caught with kms_psr_sink_crc sprite_plane_onoff
> and cursor_plane_onoff subtests.
>
> This is probably a regression since I can also get this
> with the manual test case, but with so many changes on atomic
> modeset I couldn't track exactly when this was introduced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>

Per our conversation on IRC, you need to mention that this patch only
affects the VLV family since on big core the HW tracking helps hide
the problem.

It would also be good to use the Testcase tags :)

But it looks correct. So with the amended message: Reviewed-by: Paulo
Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index af0bcfe..bb124cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -11716,7 +11716,7 @@ int intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes(struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>                 intel_crtc->atomic.update_wm_pre = true;
>         }
>
> -       if (visible)
> +       if (visible || was_visible)
>                 intel_crtc->atomic.fb_bits |=
>                         to_intel_plane(plane)->frontbuffer_bit;
>
> --
> 1.9.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



-- 
Paulo Zanoni


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list