[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: PSR also doesn't have link_entry_time on SKL.
Paulo Zanoni
przanoni at gmail.com
Fri Dec 11 11:09:20 PST 2015
2015-12-10 14:28 GMT-02:00 Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>:
> This bit is also reserved on Skylake. Actually the only
> platform that supports this is Haswell, so let's fix
> this logic and apply this link entry time only for the
> platform that supports it, i.e. Haswell.
>
> This also changes the style to let more clear platform
> differences outside the reg write. We would probably catch
> this case sooner if separated, or not...
>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 14cc2cf..9ccff30 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -276,10 +276,11 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> */
> uint32_t idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
> uint32_t val = 0x0;
> - const uint32_t link_entry_time = EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
> +
> + if (IS_HASWELL(dev))
> + val |= EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
It's kinda weird that we used the variable "val" for nothing. At least
we're using it now :). <insert bikeshed suggestion about either using
it for storing all bits or just kill it>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
>
> I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val |
> - (IS_BROADWELL(dev) ? 0 : link_entry_time) |
> max_sleep_time << EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT |
> idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT |
> EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
> --
> 2.4.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Paulo Zanoni
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list