[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] PM / Runtime: Introduce pm_runtime_get_noidle

[Imre Deak]

On Sat, 2015-12-12 at 02:51 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, December 12, 2015 12:41:06 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 12, 2015 12:21:43 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, December 11, 2015 05:47:08 PM Imre Deak wrote:
> > > > On pe, 2015-12-11 at 16:40 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Friday, December 11, 2015 02:54:45 PM Imre Deak wrote:
> > > > > > On to, 2015-12-10 at 23:14 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thursday, December 10, 2015 11:20:40 PM Imre Deak
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 22:42 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Thursday, December 10, 2015 10:36:37 PM Rafael J.
> > > > > > > > > Wysocki
> > 
> > [cut]
> > 
> > > 
> > > Yes, my suggested function can be written like this:
> > > 
> > > bool pm_runtime_get_if_active(struct device *dev)
> > > {
> > >         unsigned log flags;
> > >         bool ret = false;
> > > 
> > >         spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->power.lock, flags);
> > > 
> > >         if (dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_ACTIVE) {
> > >                 if (atomic_inc_return(&dev->power.usage_count) >
> > > 1)
> > >                 	ret = true;
> > > 		else
> > > 			atomic_dec(&dev->power.usage_count);
> > >         }
> > > 
> > >         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->power.lock, flags);
> > > 	return ret;
> > > }
> > > 
> > > but this is obviously racy with respect to anyone concurrently
> > > changing the
> > > usage counter.
> > 
> > Somethng like this would be slightly more efficient:
> 
> And below is a patch to implement the thing, compile-tested only.
> 
> Please let me know if that's what you need.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 
> 
> ---
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki at intel.com>
> Subject: PM / runtime: Add new helper for conditional usage count
> incrementation
> 
> Introduce a new runtime PM function, pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(),
> that will increment the device's runtime PM usage counter and
> return 'true' if its status is RPM_ACTIVE and its usage counter
> is greater than 0 at the same time ('false' will be returned
> otherwise).
> 
> This is useful for things that should only be done if the device
> is active (from the runtime PM perspective) and used by somebody
> (as indicated by the usage counter) already and engaging the device
> otherwise would be overkill.
> 
> Requested-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki at intel.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt |    5 +++++
>  drivers/base/power/runtime.c       |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/pm_runtime.h         |    5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> @@ -966,6 +966,27 @@ int __pm_runtime_resume(struct device *d
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__pm_runtime_resume);
>  
>  /**
> + * pm_runtime_get_if_in_use - Conditionally bump up the device's
> usage counter.
> + * @dev: Device to handle.
> + *
> + * Increment the device's runtime PM usage counter and return 'true'
> if its
> + * runtime PM status is RPM_ACTIVE and its usage counter is already
> different
> + * from zero at the same time.  Otherwise, return 'false'.
> + */
> +bool pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	bool retval;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->power.lock, flags);
> +	retval = dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_ACTIVE ?
> +		!!atomic_inc_not_zero(&dev->power.usage_count) :
> false;
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->power.lock, flags);
> +	return retval;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_runtime_get_if_in_use);
> +

To me this looks ok:
Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>

The original idea for this logic came from Chris so he may have some
comments.

Thanks,
Imre

> +/**
>   * __pm_runtime_set_status - Set runtime PM status of a device.
>   * @dev: Device to handle.
>   * @status: New runtime PM status of the device.
> Index: linux-pm/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ extern int pm_runtime_force_resume(struc
>  extern int __pm_runtime_idle(struct device *dev, int rpmflags);
>  extern int __pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev, int rpmflags);
>  extern int __pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev, int rpmflags);
> +extern bool pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(struct device *dev);
>  extern int pm_schedule_suspend(struct device *dev, unsigned int
> delay);
>  extern int __pm_runtime_set_status(struct device *dev, unsigned int
> status);
>  extern int pm_runtime_barrier(struct device *dev);
> @@ -143,6 +144,10 @@ static inline int pm_schedule_suspend(st
>  {
>  	return -ENOSYS;
>  }
> +static inline bool pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	return true;
> +}
>  static inline int __pm_runtime_set_status(struct device *dev,
>  					    unsigned int status) {
> return 0; }
>  static inline int pm_runtime_barrier(struct device *dev) { return 0;
> }
> Index: linux-pm/Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt
> +++ linux-pm/Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt
> @@ -371,6 +371,11 @@ drivers/base/power/runtime.c and include
>      - increment the device's usage counter, run
> pm_runtime_resume(dev) and
>        return its result
>  
> +  bool pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(struct device *dev);
> +    - increment the device's usage counter and return 'true' if its
> runtime PM
> +      status is 'active' and its usage counter is greater than 0 at
> the same
> +      time; return 'false' otherwise
> +
>    void pm_runtime_put_noidle(struct device *dev);
>      - decrement the device's usage counter
>  
>