[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Use MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START on 830/845

ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Mon Dec 14 08:23:49 PST 2015


From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

MI_BATCH_BUFFER is nasty since it requires that userspace pass in the
correct batch length.

Let's switch to using MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START instead (like we do on
other platforms). Then we don't have to specify the batch length
at all, and the CS will instead execute until it sees the
MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END.

We still need the batch length since we do the CS TLB workaround
and copy the batch into the permanently pinned scratch object
and execute it from there. But for this we can simply use the
batch object length when the user hasn't specified the actual
batch length. So specifying the batch length becomes just a
way to optimize the batch copy a little bit.

We lost batch_len from a bunch of igts (including the quiesce batch)
so without this igt is utterly broken on 830/845. Also some igts such
as gem_cpu_reloc never specified the batch_len and so didn't work.
With MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START we don't have to fix up igt every time
someone forgets that 830/845 exist.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 3 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c    | 6 ++----
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 5d01ea680dc1..be9fb08fccff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -1269,6 +1269,9 @@ i915_gem_ringbuffer_submission(struct i915_execbuffer_params *params,
 	exec_start = params->batch_obj_vm_offset +
 		     params->args_batch_start_offset;
 
+	if (exec_len == 0)
+		exec_len = params->batch_obj->base.size;
+
 	ret = ring->dispatch_execbuffer(params->request,
 					exec_start, exec_len,
 					params->dispatch_flags);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index e878375be7eb..71569bc3d907 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -1868,15 +1868,13 @@ i830_dispatch_execbuffer(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
 		offset = cs_offset;
 	}
 
-	ret = intel_ring_begin(req, 4);
+	ret = intel_ring_begin(req, 2);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_BATCH_BUFFER);
+	intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | MI_BATCH_GTT);
 	intel_ring_emit(ring, offset | (dispatch_flags & I915_DISPATCH_SECURE ?
 					0 : MI_BATCH_NON_SECURE));
-	intel_ring_emit(ring, offset + len - 8);
-	intel_ring_emit(ring, MI_NOOP);
 	intel_ring_advance(ring);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.4.10



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list