[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: check that we hold an RPM wakelock ref before we put it
Joonas Lahtinen
joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com
Wed Dec 16 03:00:38 PST 2015
On ti, 2015-12-15 at 20:10 +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> v2-v3:
> - unchanged
> v4:
> - keep the corresponding check in the get helper (Chris)
This is put helper you patched, so I think the above message is
incorrect.
Regards, Joonas
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 29157fb..82c55a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -2282,6 +2282,7 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_put(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
> struct device *device = &dev->pdev->dev;
>
> + assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv);
> atomic_dec(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count);
>
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(device);
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list