[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 04/10] drm/i915: remove HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from RPM get/put/assert helpers

Joonas Lahtinen joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com
Thu Dec 17 04:46:20 PST 2015


On to, 2015-12-17 at 13:48 +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> We don't really need to check this flag in the get/put/assert
> helpers,
> as on platforms without RPM support we won't ever enable RPM. That
> means
> pm.suspend will be always false and the assert will be always true.
> 
> Do this to simplify the code and to let us extend the RPM asserts to
> all
> platforms for a better coverage.
> 
> Motivated by Ville.
> 
> v2-v3:
> - unchanged
> v4:
> - remove the HAS_RUNTIME_PM check from intel_runtime_pm_enable() too
>   made possible by the previous two patches
> v5:
> - rebased on the previous new patch in the series that keeps
>   HAS_RUNTIME_PM() in intel_runtime_pm_enable() with a permanent
>   reference taken there
> 
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> (v3)
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com> (v4)

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 9 ---------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c     | 3 +--
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index bf2492f..cc0492e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -2241,9 +2241,6 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_get(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
>  	struct device *device = &dev->pdev->dev;
>  
> -	if (!HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev))
> -		return;
> -
>  	pm_runtime_get_sync(device);
>  	WARN(dev_priv->pm.suspended, "Device still suspended.\n");
>  }
> @@ -2270,9 +2267,6 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_get_noresume(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
>  	struct device *device = &dev->pdev->dev;
>  
> -	if (!HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev))
> -		return;
> -
>  	WARN(dev_priv->pm.suspended, "Getting nosync-ref while
> suspended.\n");
>  	pm_runtime_get_noresume(device);
>  }
> @@ -2290,9 +2284,6 @@ void intel_runtime_pm_put(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
>  	struct device *device = &dev->pdev->dev;
>  
> -	if (!HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev))
> -		return;
> -
>  	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(device);
>  	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(device);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index fcf04fe..0226776 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -53,8 +53,7 @@ intel_uncore_forcewake_domain_to_str(const enum
> forcewake_domain_id id)
>  static void
>  assert_device_not_suspended(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
> -	WARN_ONCE(HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev_priv->dev) && dev_priv
> ->pm.suspended,
> -		  "Device suspended\n");
> +	WARN_ONCE(dev_priv->pm.suspended, "Device suspended\n");
>  }
>  
>  static inline void
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list