[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] kms_cursor_crc: Kernel now checks for integer overflow
Matt Roper
matthew.d.roper at intel.com
Mon Feb 2 14:20:48 PST 2015
As of kernel commit
commit a679064a7e9e8799177a64a31668a34a1bc6a4f1
Author: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
Date: Fri Jan 30 16:22:37 2015 -0800
drm/i915: Switch planes from transitional helpers to full atomic helpers
the kernel now checks for cursor coordinates that would result in
integer overflow and returns -ERANGE, similar to the checking that was
already done for other plane types. We update kms_cursor_crc here to
reflect this small behavior change:
* Check for success at extreme boundary conditions INT_MAX-{width,height}
rather than INT_MAX
* Add new check for success at SHRT_MAX; if the driver were to
internally use short values and overflow, we could have the cursor
reappear on the screen.
* Add a test for failure with proper error code at INT_MAX-{width,height}+1
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
---
tests/kms_cursor_crc.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/kms_cursor_crc.c b/tests/kms_cursor_crc.c
index e1390a7..64fea12 100644
--- a/tests/kms_cursor_crc.c
+++ b/tests/kms_cursor_crc.c
@@ -139,6 +139,29 @@ static void do_single_test(data_t *data, int x, int y)
igt_assert(igt_crc_equal(&crc, &ref_crc));
}
+static void do_fail_test(data_t *data, int x, int y, int expect)
+{
+ igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
+ igt_plane_t *cursor;
+ cairo_t *cr = igt_get_cairo_ctx(data->drm_fd, &data->primary_fb);
+ int ret;
+
+ igt_print_activity();
+
+ /* Hardware test */
+ igt_paint_test_pattern(cr, data->screenw, data->screenh);
+ cursor_enable(data);
+ cursor = igt_output_get_plane(data->output, IGT_PLANE_CURSOR);
+ igt_plane_set_position(cursor, x, y);
+ ret = igt_display_try_commit2(display, COMMIT_LEGACY);
+
+ igt_plane_set_position(cursor, 0, 0);
+ cursor_disable(data);
+ igt_display_commit(display);
+
+ igt_assert(ret == expect);
+}
+
static void do_test(data_t *data,
int left, int right, int top, int bottom)
{
@@ -201,7 +224,11 @@ static void test_crc_offscreen(data_t *data)
do_test(data, left - (cursor_w+512), right + (cursor_w+512), top - (cursor_h+512), bottom + (cursor_h+512));
/* go nuts */
- do_test(data, INT_MIN, INT_MAX, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
+ do_test(data, INT_MIN, INT_MAX - cursor_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX - cursor_h);
+ do_test(data, SHRT_MIN, SHRT_MAX, SHRT_MIN, SHRT_MAX);
+
+ /* Make sure we get -ERANGE on integer overflow */
+ do_fail_test(data, INT_MAX - cursor_w + 1, INT_MAX - cursor_h + 1, -ERANGE);
}
static void test_crc_sliding(data_t *data)
--
1.8.5.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list