[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/irq: Don't call ->get_vblank_counter directly from irq_uninstall/cleanup

[Daniel Vetter]

The pipe might already have been shut down, and then it's not a good
idea to call hw accessor functions. Instead use the same logic as
drm_vblank_off which has all the necessary checks to avoid troubles or
inconsistency.

Noticed by Imre while reviewing my patches to remove some sanity
checks from ->get_vblank_counter.

v2: Try harder. disable_and_save can still access the vblank stuff
when vblank->enabled isn't set. It has to, since vlbank irq could be
disable but the pipe is still on when being called from
drm_vblank_off. But we still want to use that code for more code
sharing. So add a check for vblank->enabled on top - if that's not set
we shouldn't have anyone waiting for the vblank. If we have that's a
pretty serious bug.

The other issue that Imre spotted is drm_vblank_cleanup. That code
again calls disable_and_save and so suffers from the same issues. But
really drm_irq_uninstall should have cleaned that all up, so replace
the code with WARN_ON. Note that we can't delete the timer cleanup
since drivers aren't required to use drm_irq_install/uninstall, but
can do their own irq handling.

v3: Make it clear that all that gunk in drm_irq_uninstall is really
just bandaids for UMS races between the irq/vblank code. In UMS
userspace is in control of enabling/disabling interrupts in general
and vblanks specifically.

Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
index 1e5fb1b994d7..885fb756fed5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
@@ -269,7 +269,6 @@ static void vblank_disable_fn(unsigned long arg)
 void drm_vblank_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
 	int crtc;
-	unsigned long irqflags;
 
 	/* Bail if the driver didn't call drm_vblank_init() */
 	if (dev->num_crtcs == 0)
@@ -278,11 +277,9 @@ void drm_vblank_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev)
 	for (crtc = 0; crtc < dev->num_crtcs; crtc++) {
 		struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = &dev->vblank[crtc];
 
-		del_timer_sync(&vblank->disable_timer);
+		WARN_ON(vblank->enabled);
 
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
-		vblank_disable_and_save(dev, crtc);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
+		del_timer_sync(&vblank->disable_timer);
 	}
 
 	kfree(dev->vblank);
@@ -468,17 +465,23 @@ int drm_irq_uninstall(struct drm_device *dev)
 	dev->irq_enabled = false;
 
 	/*
-	 * Wake up any waiters so they don't hang.
+	 * Wake up any waiters so they don't hang. This is just to paper over
+	 * isssues for UMS drivers which aren't in full control of their
+	 * vblank/irq handling. KMS drivers must ensure that vblanks are all
+	 * disabled when uninstalling the irq handler.
 	 */
 	if (dev->num_crtcs) {
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
 		for (i = 0; i < dev->num_crtcs; i++) {
 			struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = &dev->vblank[i];
 
+			if (!vblank->enabled)
+				continue;
+
+			WARN_ON(drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET));
+
+			vblank_disable_and_save(dev, i);
 			wake_up(&vblank->queue);
-			vblank->enabled = false;
-			vblank->last =
-				dev->driver->get_vblank_counter(dev, i);
 		}
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
 	}
-- 
1.9.3