[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Re-order some checks to do the unlikely one first

[Damien Lespiau]

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:03:51PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 06:25:10PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > instpm_mode != relative_constants_mode is quite unlikely to happen, so
> > we can test it first to use C's && short-circuiting and not test on
> > 'ring'.
> > 
> > I know, probably a useless micro-optimisation in the big scheme of
> > things, but I'm going to add another test here, so might as well do it.
> 
> If you want to get pedantic, we want to move this to per-context :)

Do we? the API is per execbuf call, so theoretically application can
change that during the context life time (it'd be silly, but they can).
Or am I missing the point?

-- 
Damien